"was not readied" vs "has not been readied"

Question

"was not readied" vs "has not been readied"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Has not been readied' is in the present perfect tense, indicating that something has not been prepared up to the present moment. 'Was not readied' is in the past simple tense, indicating that something was not prepared at a specific point in the past.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used in the past simple tense to indicate that something was not readied at a specific point in the past.

Alternatives:

was not prepared
was not made ready
was not set up

This phrase is used in the present perfect tense to indicate that something has not been readied up to the present moment.

Alternatives:

has not been prepared
has not been made ready
has not been set up

Answer 1

was not readied

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in the context of something that was not prepared at a specific point in the past.

Answer 2

has not been readied

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in the context of something that has not been prepared up to the present moment.

"was not readied" vs "has not been readied"

was not readied

has not been readied

Related Comparisons