"has been located in" vs "has been traced to"

Question

"has been located in" vs "has been traced to"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Has been traced to' is used when referring to the origin or source of something, while 'has been located in' is used when indicating the physical position or whereabouts of something.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to specify the physical position or whereabouts of something, such as a place, object, or person.

Examples:

The missing keys have been located in the living room.
The new office has been located in the city center.
The treasure was located in a hidden cave.

Alternatives:

can be found in
is situated in
is positioned in
can be located at
can be pinpointed in

This phrase is used to indicate the origin or source of something, often in the context of tracing back the history or lineage of an object, idea, or concept.

Examples:

The outbreak has been traced to contaminated water sources.
The saying has been traced to an ancient Chinese proverb.
The tradition has been traced to early Celtic rituals.

Alternatives:

originates from
can be attributed to
can be traced back to
is rooted in
finds its origins in

Answer 1

has been located in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when indicating the physical position or whereabouts of something.

Answer 2

has been traced to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the origin or source of something.

"has been located in" vs "has been traced to"

has been located in

has been traced to

Related Comparisons