"has been employed by" vs "has been employed at"

Question

"has been employed by" vs "has been employed at"

Both "has been employed at" and "has been employed by" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Has been employed at" is used to refer to the place where someone works, while "has been employed by" is used to indicate the employer. The choice between the two depends on whether you want to focus on the location or the employer.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the employer of someone. For example, "He has been employed by the company for ten years."

Examples:

She has been employed by the government since graduation.
He has been employed by a multinational corporation for a long time.
They have been employed by the same family for generations.
I have been employed by this organization for many years.
The team has been employed by the university for a decade.

Alternatives:

has been working for
has been hired by
has been contracted by
has been engaged by
has been recruited by

You can use this phrase to talk about where someone has worked.

Explanation provided by a TextRanch English expert

Some examples from our editors:

She has been employed at Intel for the past five years.

Some alternatives from our editors:

has been employed with
has worked at

Answer 1

has been employed by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

has been employed at

This is correct

"has been employed by" vs "has been employed at"

has been employed by

has been employed at

Related Comparisons