"had no chance to change" vs "had no chance of change"

Question

"had no chance to change" vs "had no chance of change"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Had no chance to change' is used when referring to a missed opportunity or lack of opportunity to make a change. 'Had no chance of change' is used when indicating that there was no possibility of change occurring.

Last Updated: March 27, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate a missed opportunity or lack of opportunity to make a change.

Examples:

I had no chance to change my mind once the decision was made.
She had no chance to change her flight because all the seats were booked.

Alternatives:

had no opportunity to change
did not have a chance to change

This phrase is used to indicate that there was no possibility of change occurring.

Examples:

The situation had no chance of change, no matter what we did.
The policy had no chance of change due to strong opposition.

Alternatives:

had no possibility of change
had no hope of change

Answer 1

had no chance to change

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

had no chance of change

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

"had no chance to change" vs "had no chance of change"

had no chance to change

had no chance of change

Related Comparisons