TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

had increased in vs had increase in

The correct phrase is "had increased in." The verb "increase" should be in the past participle form "increased" when used with the auxiliary verb "had." This phrase is commonly used in English to indicate a past action of growth or rise.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 3686 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"had increased in "

This phrase is used to describe a past action of growth or rise in a specific context or situation.

Examples:

  • The number of participants had increased in the last quarter.
  • The company's revenue had increased in the previous year.
  • The temperature had increased in the afternoon.
  • The demand for the product had increased in the market.
  • The level of pollution had increased in the city.
  • After 12 months, BMD had increased in the lumbar spine and total hip by 5% and 1%, respectively, compared with placebo.
  • On the basis of the documents (the study) it submitted subsequently, Germany demonstrated that, notwithstanding the increase in energy taxes, energy consumption had decreased continuously and energy efficiency had increased in both vegetable and flower cultivation in greenhouses.
  • In this respect, it was found that Taiwan had a substantial domestic market for the product concerned, and that domestic prices had increased in comparison with the original investigation, in an even higher proportion than the costs of raw materials.
  • On 18 June 2008 the UN announced that Colombia's production of coca leaf (from which cocaine is extracted) had increased in the course of 2007 by no less than 27 %.
  • The Community industry pointed out that it had increased difficulties in raising capital.
  • Campbell emphasised that the interception capabilities of several European countries (e.g. Switzerland, Denmark, France) had increased substantially in recent years.
  • It had already increased in 1999, after only a slight slowdown following the Asian and Russian crises.
  • Enlargement, he said, had increased social disparities in the Union.
  • Against this background, since the mid-1990s wage moderation and consistent productivity growth have helped to contain the rise in unit labour costs, which had increased sharply in the early 1990s.
  • In 2003 prices reached an unsustainable low point and had to be increased in 2004.
  • On this basis, one interested party claimed that capacity had likely not increased in China.
  • It had increased to 38300 tonnes in 2001, but decreased in the IP.
  • It was projected that the intermodal shift would be stabilised once maritime traffic, in terms of journeys and tonnage, had increased by one third in 2011 compared with 2007.
  • It stressed that while the imports from the PRC had increased significantly in 2007 in relation to the earlier periods, the Union industry moved from a loss making to a profitable situation in that year.
  • On 26 October 2008 Porsche announced that it had increased its stake in Volkswagen by 7.48 % to 42.6 % of the ordinary shares and that it had cash-settled options (CSOs) on a further 31.5 %.
  • This indicated that profitability had increased from 15 % in 2000 to 31 % in 2002, and 33 % in 2003.
  • Union consumption dropped strongly by 24 % between 2006 and the IP. The consumption had however slightly increased in 2007 and first half of 2008.
  • The share of low achieving pupils in reading, which had increased from 21% in 2000 to 24% in 2006, improved to 20% in 2009.
  • The investigation showed that imports from the PRC had significantly increased both in absolute and relative terms during the period considered.
  • By day 6 (the last day of treatment) FEV1 had increased by 10.8% in the oseltamivir treated group compared to 4.7% on placebo (p = 0.0148) in this population.

This phrase is incorrect in English.

"had increase in"


Alternatives:

  • had increased in

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo