grouped in two to four vs grouped in two to more

Both phrases are not commonly used in English and are not correct. The correct way to express this idea would be "grouped in two to four" or "grouped in groups of two to four."

Last updated: March 15, 2024 • 780 views

grouped in two to four

This phrase is not correct in English. The preposition 'in' should be followed by 'groups of' to indicate the number of items in each group.

The correct way to express this idea is to say 'grouped in groups of two to four.' This clearly conveys that the items are organized in sets of two to four.

Show examples from the web [+]

... horizontal carousels, vertical carousels Horizontal carousels are typically grouped in two to four machines with a single operator. These arrays are sometimes ...
Sep 1, 2007 ... belongs to only one category and there are about ten categories grouped in two to four meta- categories. A certain form of disparity is taken into ...
Horizontal carousels are typically grouped in two to four machines with a single operator. The horizontal carousels are serviced in a 'round robin' fashion ...
... female ticks were grouped in two to four arthropods (according to the size and stage of life cycle) per pool and treated with the ammonium hydroxide method.

Alternatives:

grouped in groups of two to four

grouped in two to more

This phrase is not correct in English. 'More' should be followed by a specific quantity or range to make the comparison clear.

To express the idea of grouping items in sets of varying sizes, you could say 'grouped in groups of two or more.' This indicates that each group contains at least two items, but could have more.

Alternatives:

grouped in groups of two or more

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

grouped in two to four vs grouped in two to more