gdp in 2016 vs gdp for 2016

Both "GDP in 2016" and "GDP for 2016" are commonly used and correct. They are interchangeable and can be used based on personal preference. Both phrases convey the same meaning and are widely understood in English.

Last updated: March 31, 2024 • 554 views

gdp in 2016

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to refer to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) value specifically for the year 2016.

Show examples from the web [+]

The gross government debt is forecast to continue decreasing to 65,4 % of GDP in 2016 also due to the favourable macroeconomic scenario.
The debt-to-GDP ratio would start declining from 2014 onwards to reach below 160 % of GDP in 2016.
The Commission's 2015 spring forecast projects a deficit of 1,8 % of GDP in 2015 and 1,5 % of GDP in 2016.
The 2014 Stability Programme targets the headline deficit of 2,6 % of GDP in 2014 and a further reduction to 2,5 % of GDP in 2015, 1,6 % of GDP in 2016 and 0, 5 % of GDP in 2017.
The 2016 stability programme, submitted by Ireland on 29 April 2016, plans a decline in the general government deficit to 1,1 % of GDP in 2016 and, based on a no-policy-change assumption, to 0,4 % of GDP in 2017 [10].
The Stability Programme for 2016-2019, submitted by the Slovenian government on 28 April 2016, plans a decline in the general government deficit to 2,2 % of GDP in 2016 and to 1,6 % of GDP in 2017.
The 2016 stability programme targets a deficit at 3,6 % and 2,9 % of GDP in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
Granting two additional years for the correction of the excessive deficit would imply intermediate headline deficit targets of 4,1 % of GDP in 2015-2016 and 2,7 % of GDP in 2016-2017.
The baseline scenario in the Commission's updated 2015 spring forecast includes previously announced discretionary measures of 1,4 % of GDP in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, around three quarters of which are expenditure cuts.
Belgium has made a committment in its Stability Programme for 2012 to 2016 to achieve a balanced budget in structural terms in 2015, before reaching its medium-term budgetary objective (MTO) of a surplus of 0,75 % of GDP in structural terms in 2016.
Greece will accordingly pursue a new fiscal path, premised on primary surplus targets of - 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 % of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively.
The Convergence Programme for 2012 to 2016 envisages that the headline deficit will be 1,1 % of GDP in 2013, stabilising thereafter at the level of 0,9 % of GDP until 2016.
implement fully the existing reforms and also proceed with further reforms to strengthen long-term sustainability, targeting savings of around 0,25 % of GDP in 2015 and around 1 % of GDP by 2016.
The Commission's 2016 spring forecast projects the general government gross debt to remain stable in 2016 and to decrease to 105,4 % of GDP in 2017 mainly due to an increase in nominal GDP.
In the adverse case submitted by the Bank, GDP in Ireland is expected to grow by 1 % in 2014, 1,5 % in 2015, 2,2 % in 2016 and 2,2 % in 2017.
Without revealing which programs he would reduce, Romney promises to slash federal spending by more than $500 billion in 2016, capping it at 20% of GDP thereafter.
In that context, there appears to be a risk of some deviation from the required adjustment of 0,6 % of GDP towards the medium-term objective in 2016.
As a result of these developments debt-to-GDP is expected to reach 198,3 % in 2016, before decreasing to 169,3 % in 2020,154,5 % in 2022 and 115,9 % in 2030 in the baseline scenario.
After submitting the Stability Programme for 2012 to 2016, in a letter sent to the Commission on 28 May 2013, the Belgian authorities committed themselves to targetting a higher fiscal effort at 3/4 % of GDP in 2014.
To achieve that improvement, Spain was asked to implement additional measures amounting to 2 %, 1 % and 1,5 % of GDP in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.

Alternatives:

GDP for 2016
2016 GDP
GDP of 2016
2016's GDP
GDP figure for 2016

gdp for 2016