TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

gdp in 2016 vs gdp for 2016

Both "GDP in 2016" and "GDP for 2016" are commonly used and correct. They are interchangeable and can be used based on personal preference. Both phrases convey the same meaning and are widely understood in English.

Last updated: March 31, 2024 • 665 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"gdp in 2016"

This phrase is used to refer to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) value specifically for the year 2016.
  • The gross government debt is forecast to continue decreasing to 65,4 % of GDP in 2016 also due to the favourable macroeconomic scenario.
  • The debt-to-GDP ratio would start declining from 2014 onwards to reach below 160 % of GDP in 2016.
  • The Commission's 2015 spring forecast projects a deficit of 1,8 % of GDP in 2015 and 1,5 % of GDP in 2016.
  • The 2014 Stability Programme targets the headline deficit of 2,6 % of GDP in 2014 and a further reduction to 2,5 % of GDP in 2015, 1,6 % of GDP in 2016 and 0, 5 % of GDP in 2017.
  • The 2016 stability programme, submitted by Ireland on 29 April 2016, plans a decline in the general government deficit to 1,1 % of GDP in 2016 and, based on a no-policy-change assumption, to 0,4 % of GDP in 2017 [10].
  • The Stability Programme for 2016-2019, submitted by the Slovenian government on 28 April 2016, plans a decline in the general government deficit to 2,2 % of GDP in 2016 and to 1,6 % of GDP in 2017.
  • The 2016 stability programme targets a deficit at 3,6 % and 2,9 % of GDP in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
  • Granting two additional years for the correction of the excessive deficit would imply intermediate headline deficit targets of 4,1 % of GDP in 2015-2016 and 2,7 % of GDP in 2016-2017.
  • The baseline scenario in the Commission's updated 2015 spring forecast includes previously announced discretionary measures of 1,4 % of GDP in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, around three quarters of which are expenditure cuts.
  • Belgium has made a committment in its Stability Programme for 2012 to 2016 to achieve a balanced budget in structural terms in 2015, before reaching its medium-term budgetary objective (MTO) of a surplus of 0,75 % of GDP in structural terms in 2016.
  • Greece will accordingly pursue a new fiscal path, premised on primary surplus targets of - 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 % of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively.
  • The Convergence Programme for 2012 to 2016 envisages that the headline deficit will be 1,1 % of GDP in 2013, stabilising thereafter at the level of 0,9 % of GDP until 2016.
  • implement fully the existing reforms and also proceed with further reforms to strengthen long-term sustainability, targeting savings of around 0,25 % of GDP in 2015 and around 1 % of GDP by 2016.
  • The Commission's 2016 spring forecast projects the general government gross debt to remain stable in 2016 and to decrease to 105,4 % of GDP in 2017 mainly due to an increase in nominal GDP.
  • In the adverse case submitted by the Bank, GDP in Ireland is expected to grow by 1 % in 2014, 1,5 % in 2015, 2,2 % in 2016 and 2,2 % in 2017.
  • Without revealing which programs he would reduce, Romney promises to slash federal spending by more than $500 billion in 2016, capping it at 20% of GDP thereafter.
  • In that context, there appears to be a risk of some deviation from the required adjustment of 0,6 % of GDP towards the medium-term objective in 2016.
  • As a result of these developments debt-to-GDP is expected to reach 198,3 % in 2016, before decreasing to 169,3 % in 2020,154,5 % in 2022 and 115,9 % in 2030 in the baseline scenario.
  • After submitting the Stability Programme for 2012 to 2016, in a letter sent to the Commission on 28 May 2013, the Belgian authorities committed themselves to targetting a higher fiscal effort at 3/4 % of GDP in 2014.
  • To achieve that improvement, Spain was asked to implement additional measures amounting to 2 %, 1 % and 1,5 % of GDP in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.

Alternatives:

  • GDP for 2016
  • 2016 GDP
  • GDP of 2016
  • 2016's GDP
  • GDP figure for 2016

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"gdp for 2016"

This phrase is used to refer to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) value specifically for the year 2016.
  • The Icelandic authorities have submitted a simulation of a 'double dip' stress scenario. Its GDP assumptions for 2013 to 2016 simulate a further recession and higher inflation.
  • Under a revised Economic Adjustment Programme path, the primary balance targets should be set at 0 %, 1,5 %, 3 % and 4,5 % of GDP respectively for the 2013-2016 period.
  • The Stability Programme for 2016-2019, submitted by the Slovenian government on 28 April 2016, plans a decline in the general government deficit to 2,2 % of GDP in 2016 and to 1,6 % of GDP in 2017.
  • The debt-to-GDP ratio would start declining from 2014 onwards to reach below 160 % of GDP in 2016.
  • The gross government debt is forecast to continue decreasing to 65,4 % of GDP in 2016 also due to the favourable macroeconomic scenario.
  • Granting two additional years for the correction of the excessive deficit would imply intermediate headline deficit targets of 4,1 % of GDP in 2015-2016 and 2,7 % of GDP in 2016-2017.
  • The 2016 stability programme targets a deficit at 3,6 % and 2,9 % of GDP in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
  • The baseline scenario in the Commission's updated 2015 spring forecast includes previously announced discretionary measures of 1,4 % of GDP in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, around three quarters of which are expenditure cuts.
  • The Commission's 2015 spring forecast projects a deficit of 1,8 % of GDP in 2015 and 1,5 % of GDP in 2016.
  • The 2016 stability programme, submitted by Ireland on 29 April 2016, plans a decline in the general government deficit to 1,1 % of GDP in 2016 and, based on a no-policy-change assumption, to 0,4 % of GDP in 2017 [10].
  • The 2014 Stability Programme targets the headline deficit of 2,6 % of GDP in 2014 and a further reduction to 2,5 % of GDP in 2015, 1,6 % of GDP in 2016 and 0, 5 % of GDP in 2017.
  • The Convergence Programme for 2012 to 2016 envisages that the headline deficit will be 1,1 % of GDP in 2013, stabilising thereafter at the level of 0,9 % of GDP until 2016.
  • implement fully the existing reforms and also proceed with further reforms to strengthen long-term sustainability, targeting savings of around 0,25 % of GDP in 2015 and around 1 % of GDP by 2016.
  • Greece will accordingly pursue a new fiscal path, premised on primary surplus targets of - 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 % of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively.
  • I'm announcing my candidacy for 2016.
  • List of farm structure survey characteristics for 2016
  • The total amount of annual supervisory fees for 2016 shall be EUR 404536022, calculated as shown in the Annex.
  • The Union contribution for 2016 amounts to a total of EUR 72805000.
  • The programme planned for 2016 in the energy sector is therefore also kick-started.
  • The programme contained the following annual deficit projections: 4,0 % of GDP for 2007, 3,5 % of GDP for 2008 and 3,2 % of GDP for 2009.

Alternatives:

  • GDP in 2016
  • 2016 GDP
  • GDP of 2016
  • 2016's GDP
  • GDP figure for 2016

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo