"Four years after" vs "Four years later"

Question

"Four years after" vs "Four years later"

Both 'four years after' and 'four years later' are correct and commonly used phrases in English. They are interchangeable and can be used to indicate a time period of four years after a specific event or point in time.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase is used to describe a time period that is four years after a particular event or point in time. It is commonly used in both spoken and written English.

Examples:

He graduated from college four years after she did.
The company saw significant growth four years after the new CEO took over.
Four years after the accident, she finally recovered fully.
They got married four years after they met.
The project was completed four years after it was initiated.

Alternatives:

four years later
four years down the line
four years subsequently
four years afterward
four years on

This phrase is used to describe a time period that is four years after a particular event or point in time. It is commonly used in both spoken and written English.

Examples:

He got promoted four years later.
Four years later, they decided to move to a different city.
The book was published four years later.
She returned to her hometown four years later.
Four years later, the effects of the policy change became evident.

Alternatives:

four years after
four years down the line
four years subsequently
four years afterward
four years on

Answer 1

Four years after

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a time period of four years after a specific event or point in time.

Answer 2

Four years later

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a time period of four years after a specific event or point in time.

"Four years after" vs "Four years later"

Four years after

Four years later

Related Comparisons