for years 2000-2010 vs for the period 2000-2010

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'For years 2000-2010' is more commonly used when referring to a specific range of years, while 'for the period 2000-2010' is used when emphasizing a specific time frame or duration.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 1731 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific range of years.

"for years 2000-2010"

This phrase is used to indicate a range of years, such as a specific time period or duration.

Examples:

I lived in New York for years 2000-2010.
The company experienced rapid growth for years 2000-2010.

Show examples from the web [+]

Does it have figures for the years 2000 to 2010 on inland fishing catches (including pond cultivation)?
Can the Commission quantify the amount of VAT resources by which each Italian region contributed to the Community budget for each year from 2000 to 2010?
Can the Commission provide detailed information on the resources generated from the customs policy and the CAP which each Italian region has contributed to the Community budget for each year between 2000 and 2010?
Years 2000-2010: first transmission in 2011
During the years 2000-2010, the civil air passenger operations at Västerås Airport can be summarised as follows:
The EESC welcomes the specific target set out for reducing road traffic accidents, with a goal to halve the number of people killed on European roads from 50000 to 25000 within a ten year period (2000-2010).
How much has each individual club received in allowances per year (2000 to 2010)?
Can the Commission provide details of the proportion of GNP/GNI-based resources that each Italian region contributed to the EU budget each year between 2000 and 2010?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Lombardy in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Emilia-Romagna in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Friuli-Venezia Giulia in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Trentino-Alto Adige in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Sweden in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the United Kingdom in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the Netherlands in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Luxembourg in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Italy in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Denmark in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Veneto in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the Aosta Valley in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?

Alternatives:

from 2000 to 2010
between 2000 and 2010
during the years 2000-2010

This phrase is correct and is used when emphasizing a specific time frame or duration.

"for the period 2000-2010"

This phrase is used to highlight a particular period of time, indicating a specific range of years.

Examples:

The study covers the period 2000-2010.
The economic crisis lasted for the period 2000-2010.

Alternatives:

during the period 2000-2010
from 2000 to 2010
between 2000 and 2010

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

for years 2000-2010 vs for the period 2000-2010