for years 2000-2010 vs for the period 2000-2010

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'For years 2000-2010' is more commonly used when referring to a specific range of years, while 'for the period 2000-2010' is used when emphasizing a specific time frame or duration.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 1618 views

for years 2000-2010

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific range of years.

This phrase is used to indicate a range of years, such as a specific time period or duration.

Examples:

I lived in New York for years 2000-2010.
The company experienced rapid growth for years 2000-2010.

Show examples from the web [+]

Does it have figures for the years 2000 to 2010 on inland fishing catches (including pond cultivation)?
Can the Commission quantify the amount of VAT resources by which each Italian region contributed to the Community budget for each year from 2000 to 2010?
Can the Commission provide detailed information on the resources generated from the customs policy and the CAP which each Italian region has contributed to the Community budget for each year between 2000 and 2010?
Years 2000-2010: first transmission in 2011
During the years 2000-2010, the civil air passenger operations at Västerås Airport can be summarised as follows:
The EESC welcomes the specific target set out for reducing road traffic accidents, with a goal to halve the number of people killed on European roads from 50000 to 25000 within a ten year period (2000-2010).
How much has each individual club received in allowances per year (2000 to 2010)?
Can the Commission provide details of the proportion of GNP/GNI-based resources that each Italian region contributed to the EU budget each year between 2000 and 2010?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Lombardy in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Emilia-Romagna in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Friuli-Venezia Giulia in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Trentino-Alto Adige in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Sweden in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the United Kingdom in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the Netherlands in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Luxembourg in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Italy in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Denmark in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Veneto in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the Aosta Valley in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?

Alternatives:

from 2000 to 2010
between 2000 and 2010
during the years 2000-2010

for the period 2000-2010

This phrase is correct and is used when emphasizing a specific time frame or duration.

This phrase is used to highlight a particular period of time, indicating a specific range of years.

Examples:

The study covers the period 2000-2010.
The economic crisis lasted for the period 2000-2010.

Alternatives:

during the period 2000-2010
from 2000 to 2010
between 2000 and 2010

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

for years 2000-2010 vs for the period 2000-2010