TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

for years 2000-2010 vs for the period 2000-2010

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'For years 2000-2010' is more commonly used when referring to a specific range of years, while 'for the period 2000-2010' is used when emphasizing a specific time frame or duration.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 1580 views

for years 2000-2010

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific range of years.

This phrase is used to indicate a range of years, such as a specific time period or duration.

Examples:

  • I lived in New York for years 2000-2010.
  • The company experienced rapid growth for years 2000-2010.
  • Does it have figures for the years 2000 to 2010 on inland fishing catches (including pond cultivation)?
  • Can the Commission quantify the amount of VAT resources by which each Italian region contributed to the Community budget for each year from 2000 to 2010?
  • Can the Commission provide detailed information on the resources generated from the customs policy and the CAP which each Italian region has contributed to the Community budget for each year between 2000 and 2010?
  • Years 2000-2010: first transmission in 2011
  • During the years 2000-2010, the civil air passenger operations at Västerås Airport can be summarised as follows:
  • The EESC welcomes the specific target set out for reducing road traffic accidents, with a goal to halve the number of people killed on European roads from 50000 to 25000 within a ten year period (2000-2010).
  • How much has each individual club received in allowances per year (2000 to 2010)?
  • Can the Commission provide details of the proportion of GNP/GNI-based resources that each Italian region contributed to the EU budget each year between 2000 and 2010?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Lombardy in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Emilia-Romagna in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Friuli-Venezia Giulia in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Trentino-Alto Adige in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Sweden in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the United Kingdom in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the Netherlands in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Luxembourg in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Italy in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Denmark in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for Veneto in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?
  • Can the Commission specify the grand total of Community funds earmarked for the Aosta Valley in the preceding programming period (2000-06), in the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, last year, in the current year, and for next year?

Alternatives:

  • from 2000 to 2010
  • between 2000 and 2010
  • during the years 2000-2010

for the period 2000-2010

This phrase is correct and is used when emphasizing a specific time frame or duration.

This phrase is used to highlight a particular period of time, indicating a specific range of years.

Examples:

  • The study covers the period 2000-2010.
  • The economic crisis lasted for the period 2000-2010.

Alternatives:

  • during the period 2000-2010
  • from 2000 to 2010
  • between 2000 and 2010

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!