TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

for the above states vs in the above states

Both "for the above states" and "in the above states" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "For the above states" is used when referring to actions or decisions that apply to the states mentioned, while "in the above states" is used when describing something that exists or occurs within those states.

Last updated: March 29, 2024

for the above states

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to actions or decisions that apply to the states mentioned.

This phrase is used to indicate that something is intended or applicable to the states mentioned in the preceding context.

Examples:

  • For the above states, the new policy will come into effect next month.
  • I wish to express my indignation at the Commission's stated position that the issue of veterinary inspections by the Russian Federation is an internal matter for the above states.
  • The organisation and the carrying out of procurement procedures for the above-mentioned state bodies can be conducted by a single institution, determined in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
  • For the above reasons the Italian State has - since 1980 and by means of appropriate laws - supported welfare activities by making an ordinary state contribution to the ANCR and banning contributions for private bodies.
  • Any of the above states where the difference has been applied between source and destination.
  • The Commission requested further information, regarding the above State measures, by letter of 9 July 2010.
  • Does it consider the above state of affairs to be a problem on which we should immediately focus our attention? 2.
  • In connection with the above state of affairs the Commission (DG Comp and DG Markt) instructed the Italian authorities to abide by Community law.
  • Is the above state of affairs compatible with European rules on the protection of passengers' rights?
  • Does the above state of affairs present any danger to European consumers?
  • What information does it hold regarding the above state of affairs?
  • The recital above states that the total Union production was established at around 8270 tonnes.
  • Does the above state of affairs (abolition of the law on exclusion from criminal sanctions of 1946) change this?
  • Does the above state of affairs hamper the use of processed and converted manure as a substitute for artificial fertiliser?
  • The CPB report, referred to above states that there is no evidence 'for a substantial geographical or social digital divide in the Netherlands.
  • Since the above state of affairs is disrupting the applicants' legal certainty and is also in breach of the principle of processing applications without undue delay, would the Commission state:
  • What is the opinion of the Article 29 Working Party, which has been consulted on the WADA proposal, on the above state of affairs?
  • In this event, we must tell our Spanish Socialist Members - with the greatest of respect - that they have allowed party interests to be placed above State interests.
  • In this regard, it must be pointed out that the finding above states that there appears to be no economic justification to export B100 in lieu of B99 to the Community.
  • It follows from the above that state aid rules only apply to advantages granted to undertakings.
  • What is the Commission's assessment of the above state of affairs with regard to the agreement on the Pelješac bridge project and the determination of the sea borders between Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia?

Alternatives:

  • for those states
  • for the states mentioned above
  • for the states listed above
  • for the aforementioned states
  • for the states specified above

in the above states

This phrase is correct and commonly used when describing something that exists or occurs within the states mentioned.

This phrase is used to specify that something is located or happening within the states mentioned in the preceding context.

Examples:

  • In the above states, the weather conditions are quite diverse.
  • This supplement lists all the varieties the official acceptance of which was granted in the above Member States in accordance with the principles of Council Directive 2002/55/EC.
  • In connection with the above state of affairs the Commission (DG Comp and DG Markt) instructed the Italian authorities to abide by Community law.
  • These companies breached EU competition rules, as they had fixed the prices of their products in the above EU Member States for the period 2002-05.
  • what information it has regarding what is happening in India, in particular in the above-mentioned states;
  • The number of bovine animals belonging to certain risk groups tested in the above Member States were: 248 in Greece, 763 in Luxembourg, 3295 in Austria, 4527 in Finland and 8254 in Sweden.
  • The Council has already reached three political agreements on proposals in the above package (port State control, Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system, principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector).
  • Clear, quantifiable objectives can also act as additional incentives to improve road safety in the Member States - above all if harmonised data makes regular comparisons of the progress made and assessments of national policies possible and if the results are made public.
  • When communicating the information referred to in the subparagraph above, Member States shall state:
  • Nobody, after all, can grasp how it is that we still have almost forty blocks of airspace in the skies above fifteen Member States long after land borders have been abolished.
  • A third of a combat division was returning from Germany... in the air above the United States, at the time of the shooting.
  • In the Member States listed above, how many licences have been granted annually since 2001?
  • Notes with concern that the weaknesses detected in 2012 in the above-mentioned Member States were very similar to those found and reported in the six different Member States which were audited in 2011 (Denmark, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Austria and Finland);
  • Does the Commission: agree that in the case specified above a State guarantee for Siemens AG or Framatome ANP would breach the Treaty, in particular Article 87(1) on the incompatibility of State aid with the internal market?
  • Are conditions in the Member States, above all those in the various branches of industry, including in particular the different types of mining, taken into consideration when setting a limit value, even if it is only an indicative limit value?
  • Any of the above states where the difference has been applied between source and destination.
  • The Commission requested further information, regarding the above State measures, by letter of 9 July 2010.
  • Does it consider the above state of affairs to be a problem on which we should immediately focus our attention? 2.
  • I wish to express my indignation at the Commission's stated position that the issue of veterinary inspections by the Russian Federation is an internal matter for the above states.
  • Is the above state of affairs compatible with European rules on the protection of passengers' rights?
  • Does the above state of affairs present any danger to European consumers?

Alternatives:

  • within the above states
  • inside the above states
  • within those states
  • inside those states
  • within the states mentioned above

Related Comparisons

for the below orders vs for the orders for below two vs for the below two for the request below vs for the below request of the below vouchers vs for the below vouchers By the above reasoning vs For the above reason

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!