"for uniformity" vs "for text uniformity"

Question

"for uniformity" vs "for text uniformity"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'For text uniformity' is more specific and implies that the uniformity is related to text, while 'for uniformity' is more general and can refer to any kind of uniformity. The choice between the two depends on the context and the level of specificity required.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase can be used when talking about achieving uniformity in a broader sense, not limited to text alone.

Examples:

The guidelines were established for uniformity across all departments.
We need to check the measurements for uniformity in the project.

Alternatives:

for consistency
to ensure uniformity
for standardization
for homogeneity
for coherence

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize achieving uniformity in text, such as font style, size, or formatting.

Examples:

We need to adjust the spacing for text uniformity throughout the document.
The editor made changes for text uniformity in the publication.

Alternatives:

for consistency in text
to ensure text uniformity
for text coherence
for text standardization
for text homogeneity

Answer 1

for uniformity

This phrase is correct and more general, suitable for referring to achieving uniformity in various contexts.

Answer 2

for text uniformity

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to achieving uniformity specifically in text.

"for uniformity" vs "for text uniformity"

for uniformity

for text uniformity

Related Comparisons