"for small-size houses" vs "have less skewed distribution"

Question

"for small-size houses" vs "have less skewed distribution"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they convey different meanings. The first phrase refers to the size of houses, while the second phrase discusses the distribution of something. Therefore, it's not possible to determine which one is correct as they serve different purposes.

Last Updated: March 08, 2024

This phrase is used to describe houses that are small in size. It indicates that the houses being referred to are of a small physical dimension.

This phrase is used to describe a distribution that is less skewed, indicating that the data points are more evenly distributed without extreme outliers.

Answer 1

for small-size houses

This phrase is correct and commonly used to refer to houses that are small in size.

Answer 2

have less skewed distribution

This phrase is correct and is used to describe a distribution that is less skewed, meaning it is more evenly spread out.

"for small-size houses" vs "have less skewed distribution"

for small-size houses

have less skewed distribution

Related Comparisons