"for reduction of" vs "for reduction in"

Question

"for reduction of" vs "for reduction in"

Both "for reduction in" and "for reduction of" are commonly used phrases in English, but they are used in different contexts. "For reduction in" is used when referring to a decrease or cut in something, while "for reduction of" is used when talking about the process of making something smaller or less in amount.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to the process of making something smaller or less in amount. For example, "The medication is for reduction of inflammation."

Examples:

The plan is for reduction of waste production.
They are working on a strategy for reduction of costs.
The treatment is for reduction of pain.
The campaign aims for reduction of water usage.
The program focuses on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Alternatives:

for decrease of
for cutting of
for lowering of
for diminution of
for decline of

This phrase is used when talking about a decrease or cut in something. For example, "The company implemented cost-saving measures for reduction in expenses."

Examples:

The government is aiming for reduction in carbon emissions.
There was a significant reduction in crime rates last year.
The new policy is designed for reduction in energy consumption.
Efforts are being made for reduction in plastic waste.
The program focuses on reduction in poverty levels.

Alternatives:

for decrease in
for cut in
for lowering of
for diminution in
for decline in

Answer 1

for reduction of

This phrase is correct and commonly used when talking about the process of making something smaller or less in amount.

Answer 2

for reduction in

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a decrease or cut in something.

"for reduction of" vs "for reduction in"

for reduction of

for reduction in

Related Comparisons