TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

for patients who vs for patients that

Both 'for patients who' and 'for patients that' are commonly used and correct in English. They are interchangeable in most cases, but 'who' is more formal and preferred when referring to people. 'That' is more commonly used when referring to things or animals.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 926 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to people.

"for patients who"

Use 'for patients who' when referring to people. 'Who' is more formal and preferred when talking about individuals. It adds a personal touch to the sentence.

Examples:

  • The treatment is designed for patients who have a history of heart disease.
  • For patients who are experiencing severe symptoms, immediate medical attention is necessary.
  • REYATAZ oral powder is available for patients who are unable to swallow capsules.
  • REYATAZ also comes as a powder for patients who have difficulty swallowing capsules.
  • Infusion of Replagal at home may be considered for patients who are tolerating their infusions well.
  • This could lead to doubts and uncertainties for patients who may not have the possibility to choose between different medicines.
  • The oral solution can be considered for patients who have difficulty swallowing tablets.
  • Emtriva 200 mg hard capsules are only suitable for patients who weigh at least 33 kg.
  • Sebivo oral solution may be considered for patients who have difficulties swallowing tablets.
  • They're for patients who can't take pills.
  • The recommended dose of Emtriva is one capsule once a day for patients who weigh 33 kg or more.
  • However, a direct switch from levodopa/ DDC inhibitor to Stalevo is not recommended for patients who have dyskinesias or whose daily levodopa dose is above 800 mg.
  • So I designed the 5.0 for patients who would otherwise have to drive hours for routine programming.
  • The aim is to clarify entitlements to refunds and to guarantee quality and safety standards for patients who have medical care in a Member State other than their own.
  • Administration of the capsule contents with a small amount (1-2 teaspoons) of food may be considered for patients who cannot tolerate the oral solution.
  • These are only suitable for patients who weigh at least 33 kg and can swallow hard capsules.
  • This is the same for patients who can not access treatments due to their unavailability in their Member State of affiliation.
  • Mr President, I completely disagree with Mr Matsakis, as the Commission proposal does not, in fact, provide legal certainty for patients who get treatment outside their home countries.
  • Although Agenerase oral solution is available for patients who cannot swallow the capsules, it cannot be given with ritonavir because the safety of this combination has not been assessed.
  • When deciding on a new regimen for patients who have failed an antiretroviral regimen, careful consideration should be given to the patterns of mutations associated with different medicinal products and the treatment history of the individual patient.
  • Epivir is also available as an oral solution for children over three months of age and who weigh less than 14 kg or for patients who are unable to swallow tablets.
  • A lower dose of 22 micrograms (6 million IU) given three times per week, is recommended for patients who cannot tolerate the higher dose. adolescents from the age of 12 years.

Alternatives:

  • for individuals who
  • for people who
  • for those who
  • for patients that
  • for individuals that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to things or animals.

"for patients that"

Use 'for patients that' when referring to things or animals. 'That' is more commonly used in these cases and is less formal than 'who'.

Examples:

  • The medication is suitable for patients that have allergies to other drugs.
  • For patients that require surgery, a consultation with the surgeon is necessary.
  • Let's be liberal with pain meds for our victims and sedatives for patients that we are moving.
  • Telex the hospitals for patients that fit.
  • I have set therapeutic goals for patients that Julie was too narrow-minded to comprehend.
  • For patients that require haemodialysis and in patients with severe renal impairment (GFR < 30 ml/ min), the dose should be reduced by 50%.
  • The incidence of both ACUITY-scale and TIMI-scale bleeding events up to day 30 is presented in Table 9 for the overall (ITT) population and for patients that received aspirin and clopidogrel as per protocol.
  • Prior authorisation is essential for all hospital and specialised care as it provides a guarantee for patients that they will be treated and that the treatment will be covered by their social security system.
  • In fact, when his nurse told me that he had ordered medications for patients that didn't really exist, I wondered if he was thinking of testing those drugs to see if they were real.
  • From studies it is clear that the use of falsified medicines is so dangerous for patients that it puts lives at risk: it is therefore right to consider falsification to be a criminal act warranting the adoption of a strong stance by the European Union.
  • It is good news for patients that we will soon have Community legislation on tissues and cells.

Alternatives:

  • for individuals that
  • for people that
  • for those that
  • for patients who
  • for individuals who

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo