for patients who vs for patients that

Both 'for patients who' and 'for patients that' are commonly used and correct in English. They are interchangeable in most cases, but 'who' is more formal and preferred when referring to people. 'That' is more commonly used when referring to things or animals.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 779 views

for patients who

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to people.

Use 'for patients who' when referring to people. 'Who' is more formal and preferred when talking about individuals. It adds a personal touch to the sentence.

Examples:

The treatment is designed for patients who have a history of heart disease.
For patients who are experiencing severe symptoms, immediate medical attention is necessary.

Show examples from the web [+]

REYATAZ oral powder is available for patients who are unable to swallow capsules.
REYATAZ also comes as a powder for patients who have difficulty swallowing capsules.
Infusion of Replagal at home may be considered for patients who are tolerating their infusions well.
This could lead to doubts and uncertainties for patients who may not have the possibility to choose between different medicines.
The oral solution can be considered for patients who have difficulty swallowing tablets.
Emtriva 200 mg hard capsules are only suitable for patients who weigh at least 33 kg.
Sebivo oral solution may be considered for patients who have difficulties swallowing tablets.
They're for patients who can't take pills.
The recommended dose of Emtriva is one capsule once a day for patients who weigh 33 kg or more.
However, a direct switch from levodopa/ DDC inhibitor to Stalevo is not recommended for patients who have dyskinesias or whose daily levodopa dose is above 800 mg.
So I designed the 5.0 for patients who would otherwise have to drive hours for routine programming.
The aim is to clarify entitlements to refunds and to guarantee quality and safety standards for patients who have medical care in a Member State other than their own.
Administration of the capsule contents with a small amount (1-2 teaspoons) of food may be considered for patients who cannot tolerate the oral solution.
These are only suitable for patients who weigh at least 33 kg and can swallow hard capsules.
This is the same for patients who can not access treatments due to their unavailability in their Member State of affiliation.
Mr President, I completely disagree with Mr Matsakis, as the Commission proposal does not, in fact, provide legal certainty for patients who get treatment outside their home countries.
Although Agenerase oral solution is available for patients who cannot swallow the capsules, it cannot be given with ritonavir because the safety of this combination has not been assessed.
When deciding on a new regimen for patients who have failed an antiretroviral regimen, careful consideration should be given to the patterns of mutations associated with different medicinal products and the treatment history of the individual patient.
Epivir is also available as an oral solution for children over three months of age and who weigh less than 14 kg or for patients who are unable to swallow tablets.
A lower dose of 22 micrograms (6 million IU) given three times per week, is recommended for patients who cannot tolerate the higher dose. adolescents from the age of 12 years.

Alternatives:

for individuals who
for people who
for those who
for patients that
for individuals that

for patients that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to things or animals.

Use 'for patients that' when referring to things or animals. 'That' is more commonly used in these cases and is less formal than 'who'.