for consistent discussion, vs for consistent discussion, we

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'For consistent discussion,' is a concise and formal way to introduce a topic or point in writing. On the other hand, 'For consistent discussion, we' is more suitable when you want to emphasize the involvement of a specific group or entity in the discussion.

Last updated: March 19, 2024 • 990 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in writing to introduce a topic or point in a concise and formal manner.

"for consistent discussion, "

This phrase is used to set the stage for a consistent discussion or to introduce a topic in a clear and direct way.

Examples:

For consistent discussion, we need to establish some ground rules.
For consistent discussion, it is important to consider all viewpoints.
For consistent discussion, let's focus on the main issues at hand.
For consistent discussion, a structured approach is necessary.
For consistent discussion, clarity in communication is key.

Show examples from the web [+]

... criteria to make sure that we are always striving to be the best middle school we can and also as a tool for consistent discussion and school improvement.
We also know that many of you work in isolation and that there are few opportunities for consistent discussion and professional development around this topic.
There is specific mentoring time built into your weekly schedule to allow for consistent discussion and learning. Every new PT and PTA also go through a PT ...
The Honor Code provides a framework for consistent discussion of academic integrity in all classes and across many different departments and programs.

Alternatives:

To ensure a consistent discussion,
In order to have a consistent discussion,
When aiming for a consistent discussion,
To maintain a consistent discussion,
In the context of consistent discussion,

This phrase is correct and commonly used when emphasizing the involvement of a specific group or entity in the discussion.

"for consistent discussion, we"

This phrase is suitable when you want to highlight that a particular group or entity is engaged in the consistent discussion.

Examples:

For consistent discussion, we must all actively participate.
For consistent discussion, we need to collaborate effectively.
For consistent discussion, we should listen to each other's perspectives.
For consistent discussion, we have to be open to new ideas.
For consistent discussion, we can schedule regular meetings.

Alternatives:

For consistent discussion, all participants
For consistent discussion, the team
For consistent discussion, the group
For consistent discussion, stakeholders
For consistent discussion, everyone

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

for consistent discussion, vs for consistent discussion, we

"for consistent discussion, "

"for consistent discussion, we"

Related Comparisons