"first of all" vs "first thing first"

Question

"first of all" vs "first thing first"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'First of all' is used to introduce the first point in a series of points or steps, while 'first things first' is used to prioritize tasks or actions. They are not interchangeable.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

This phrase is used to introduce the initial point or step in a series of points or steps. It is often used in speeches, presentations, or discussions to outline the order of topics.

Examples:

First of all, I want to thank everyone for coming today.
First of all, let's address the main issue at hand.
First of all, we need to understand the background of the problem.

Alternatives:

To begin with
Firstly
In the first place
Initially
At the outset

This phrase is used to emphasize the importance of prioritizing tasks or actions. It is often used to remind someone to focus on the most important or urgent task first.

Examples:

First things first, we need to address the safety concerns.
First things first, let's make sure everyone is on board with the plan.
First things first, we need to gather all the necessary information.

Alternatives:

First things foremost
Prioritize the first task
Start with the most important thing
Address the primary issue first
Deal with the main task initially

Answer 1

first of all

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce the first point in a series of points or steps.

Answer 2

first thing first

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to emphasize the importance of prioritizing tasks or actions.

"first of all" vs "first thing first"

first of all

first thing first

Related Comparisons