🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

fewer errors vs less errors

The correct phrase is 'fewer errors.' 'Fewer' is used with countable nouns like 'errors,' while 'less' is used with uncountable nouns. In this case, 'errors' is countable, so 'fewer' is the appropriate choice.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 2194 views

fewer errors

This phrase is correct. 'Fewer' is used with countable nouns like 'errors.'

Use 'fewer errors' when referring to a smaller number of mistakes or inaccuracies in a countable context.

Examples:

  • I made fewer errors on the test this time.
  • The new software has resulted in fewer errors in our reports.
  • She has fewer errors in her writing compared to last year.
  • We need to strive for fewer errors in our work.
  • The goal is to have fewer errors in the final product.
  • To conclude, reduction of the regulatory burden and national declarations of assurance should lead to fewer errors in financial management.
  • Indeed, fewer errors are usually produced by such a process compared to an identification process (1 to n comparison) which presents higher error rates.
  • This is why it has also been concluded, here, that the Union's agricultural policy has a high error rate, but where procedures for the use of funds have been simplified, there are fewer errors than where it is more complicated.
  • In the same way, the less time these actors need to prepare applications, the fewer errors they will make.
  • We need a simplification of the application processes so that, first of all, fewer errors are made, and, secondly, so that access for those people who really want to work can be made easier through this European cohesion policy.
  • When you have fewer declaration obligations, you have fewer risks of error.
  • This proposal does not excessively constrain action by the Member States, and it should also lead to significantly less subjective error and fewer accidents.
  • As RIS provides skippers with more accurate and reliable information by means of electronic charts, there should be significantly less subjective error and ultimately therefore significantly fewer accidents.
  • Sweden was the second worse of the Member States, as no fewer than 64 % of the applications examined in Sweden contained errors.

Alternatives:

  • fewer mistakes
  • fewer inaccuracies
  • fewer faults
  • fewer blunders
  • fewer slip-ups

less errors

This phrase is incorrect. 'Less' should not be used with countable nouns like 'errors.'

  • And as you go up, those are the bigger trials, so they've got less error in them.
  • As RIS provides skippers with more accurate and reliable information by means of electronic charts, there should be significantly less subjective error and ultimately therefore significantly fewer accidents.
  • This proposal does not excessively constrain action by the Member States, and it should also lead to significantly less subjective error and fewer accidents.
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter, less two standard errors, greater than 6μm.
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter, less two standard errors, greater than 6μm.
  • The slides shall be of sufficiently high quality and contrast toenable measurements to be carried out with an error of less than 5 %.
  • Note R: The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter less two standard geometric errors greater than 6 µm.
  • The slide must be of sufficiently high quality and contrast to enable measurement to be carried out with an error of less than 5 %.
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter less two standard geometric errors greater than 6 μm.
  • Nominal weight Tolerable negative error less than 1100 251100 and more 50
  • The position of vessels shall be determined with a margin of error of less than 500 metres and a confidence interval of 99 %.
  • The position of vessels shall be determined with a margin of error of less than 100 metres and a confidence interval of 99 %.
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter less two standard errors greater than 6 ìm.';
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter, less two standard errors, greater than 6μm.';
  • Now the problem here is that patternicities will occur whenever the cost of making a Type I error is less than the cost of making a Type II error.
  • If the variance is high, on the other hand, practical experience suggests that the mean values of the replicates may provide a more robust mathematical estimation, less influenced by systematic errors in the data, than with each individual data point retained.
  • The position of the vessels will be determined with a margin of error of less than 500 metres and with a confidence interval of 99 %.
  • b. the vessel's most recent geographical position (longitude, latitude), with a margin of error of less than 500 metres and a confidence interval of 99%;
  • Where a precise measurement with a possible margin of error of less than 10 % of the limit value is required, measure AEd on the projection axis, the value of the spot width being taken at the point where the luminance is 0,5 times the maximum spot-luminancevalue.
  • This editing space can display more saturated colors than Adobe RGB. It is less prone to quantisation errors compared to ProPhoto RGB, although more shadow detail is preserved. In most instances ProPhoto RGB is probably a better choice.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!