TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

fewer errors vs less errors

The correct phrase is 'fewer errors.' 'Fewer' is used with countable nouns like 'errors,' while 'less' is used with uncountable nouns. In this case, 'errors' is countable, so 'fewer' is the appropriate choice.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 2313 views

This phrase is correct. 'Fewer' is used with countable nouns like 'errors.'

"fewer errors"

Use 'fewer errors' when referring to a smaller number of mistakes or inaccuracies in a countable context.

Examples:

  • I made fewer errors on the test this time.
  • The new software has resulted in fewer errors in our reports.
  • She has fewer errors in her writing compared to last year.
  • We need to strive for fewer errors in our work.
  • The goal is to have fewer errors in the final product.
  • To conclude, reduction of the regulatory burden and national declarations of assurance should lead to fewer errors in financial management.
  • Indeed, fewer errors are usually produced by such a process compared to an identification process (1 to n comparison) which presents higher error rates.
  • This is why it has also been concluded, here, that the Union's agricultural policy has a high error rate, but where procedures for the use of funds have been simplified, there are fewer errors than where it is more complicated.
  • In the same way, the less time these actors need to prepare applications, the fewer errors they will make.
  • We need a simplification of the application processes so that, first of all, fewer errors are made, and, secondly, so that access for those people who really want to work can be made easier through this European cohesion policy.
  • When you have fewer declaration obligations, you have fewer risks of error.
  • This proposal does not excessively constrain action by the Member States, and it should also lead to significantly less subjective error and fewer accidents.
  • As RIS provides skippers with more accurate and reliable information by means of electronic charts, there should be significantly less subjective error and ultimately therefore significantly fewer accidents.
  • Sweden was the second worse of the Member States, as no fewer than 64 % of the applications examined in Sweden contained errors.

Alternatives:

  • fewer mistakes
  • fewer inaccuracies
  • fewer faults
  • fewer blunders
  • fewer slip-ups

This phrase is incorrect. 'Less' should not be used with countable nouns like 'errors.'

"less errors"

  • And as you go up, those are the bigger trials, so they've got less error in them.
  • As RIS provides skippers with more accurate and reliable information by means of electronic charts, there should be significantly less subjective error and ultimately therefore significantly fewer accidents.
  • This proposal does not excessively constrain action by the Member States, and it should also lead to significantly less subjective error and fewer accidents.
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter, less two standard errors, greater than 6μm.
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter, less two standard errors, greater than 6μm.
  • The slides shall be of sufficiently high quality and contrast toenable measurements to be carried out with an error of less than 5 %.
  • Note R: The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter less two standard geometric errors greater than 6 µm.
  • The slide must be of sufficiently high quality and contrast to enable measurement to be carried out with an error of less than 5 %.
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter less two standard geometric errors greater than 6 μm.
  • Nominal weight Tolerable negative error less than 1100 251100 and more 50
  • The position of vessels shall be determined with a margin of error of less than 500 metres and a confidence interval of 99 %.
  • The position of vessels shall be determined with a margin of error of less than 100 metres and a confidence interval of 99 %.
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter less two standard errors greater than 6 ìm.';
  • The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter, less two standard errors, greater than 6μm.';
  • Now the problem here is that patternicities will occur whenever the cost of making a Type I error is less than the cost of making a Type II error.
  • If the variance is high, on the other hand, practical experience suggests that the mean values of the replicates may provide a more robust mathematical estimation, less influenced by systematic errors in the data, than with each individual data point retained.
  • The position of the vessels will be determined with a margin of error of less than 500 metres and with a confidence interval of 99 %.
  • b. the vessel's most recent geographical position (longitude, latitude), with a margin of error of less than 500 metres and a confidence interval of 99%;
  • Where a precise measurement with a possible margin of error of less than 10 % of the limit value is required, measure AEd on the projection axis, the value of the spot width being taken at the point where the luminance is 0,5 times the maximum spot-luminancevalue.
  • This editing space can display more saturated colors than Adobe RGB. It is less prone to quantisation errors compared to ProPhoto RGB, although more shadow detail is preserved. In most instances ProPhoto RGB is probably a better choice.

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo