🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

fewer components vs lesser components

The correct phrase is 'fewer components.' 'Fewer' is used when referring to countable items, while 'lesser' is used for uncountable qualities or amounts. In this case, 'components' are countable, so 'fewer components' is the appropriate choice.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 1540 views

fewer components

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Use 'fewer components' when referring to a smaller number of countable parts or elements.

Examples:

  • The new design has fewer components, making it more efficient.
  • We need fewer components to complete the project on time.
  • With fewer cars and fewer components coming and going, goods transport is also affected.
  • fewer repairs because of the increased longevity of components and longer intervals between services,
  • Some projects, in particular the water and sanitation component of the UN agency project in Indonesia, reached fewer beneficiaries than initially planned mainly due to an overestimation in the needs assessments.

Alternatives:

  • a smaller number of components
  • a reduced number of components
  • a limited number of components
  • a decreased number of components
  • a diminished number of components

lesser components

This phrase is not correct in this context. 'Lesser' is used for uncountable qualities or amounts, not countable items like components.

  • the separate component of equity associated with the hedged item is adjusted to the lesser of the following (in absolute amounts):
  • HEADLINE INFLATION AFFECTED BY VOLATILE COMPONENTS The volatile components of the HICP, in particular energy and to a lesser extent unprocessed food prices, largely explain the pattern of headline inflation in 2004 (see Chart 21).
  • This decline is mostly explained by developments in the energy component, and to a lesser extent by developments in the intermediate and consumer goods components (see Chart 17).

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!