1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"were not, had" vs "eyes roaming over"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they are quite different in structure and meaning. "Eyes roaming over" is a common phrase used to describe someone looking around or scanning a space, while "were not, had" seems to be a fragment of a sentence that is incomplete. It's important to provide more context or complete the second phrase to determine its correctness.

Last Updated: March 12, 2024

were not, had

This phrase seems to be incomplete or out of context. It does not form a complete or coherent sentence.

To make this phrase correct, it needs to be part of a complete sentence or have additional context provided.

eyes roaming over

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to describe someone looking around or scanning a space.

This phrase is often used to convey the action of someone's eyes moving across a scene or area, indicating curiosity, observation, or interest.

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!