Which one is correct?
"evidence of" or "evidence for"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"evidence of" or "evidence for"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

Use 'evidence of' when referring to the existence or presence of evidence that supports a claim or statement.

Examples:

There is no evidence of foul play in the investigation.
The report provides evidence of climate change.

Alternatives:

proof of
indication of
sign of
demonstration of
manifestation of

Use 'evidence for' when referring to support or justification for a claim or argument.

Examples:

There is strong evidence for the effectiveness of the new treatment.
The data provides evidence for the hypothesis.

Alternatives:

support for
justification for
proof for
substantiation for
corroboration for

Both 'evidence of' and 'evidence for' are commonly used phrases in English, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Evidence of' is used to indicate the existence or presence of evidence, while 'evidence for' is used to show support or justification for a claim or argument.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024