"Employed in a place" vs "Employed at a place"

Question

"Employed in a place" vs "Employed at a place"

Both 'employed at a place' and 'employed in a place' are commonly used phrases in English. The choice between 'at' and 'in' depends on the context and the specific place being referred to. 'Employed at a place' is more commonly used when referring to a specific company or organization, while 'employed in a place' can be used in a broader sense to refer to a general location or area.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone is working in a particular location or area. For example, 'He is employed in a remote area of the country.'

Examples:

She is employed in a small town in the mountains.
He is employed in a rural area in the Midwest.
They are employed in a coastal city.

Alternatives:

working in a place
hired in a place
engaged in a place
employed within a location
working within an area

This phrase is used to indicate that someone is working for a particular company or organization. For example, 'She is employed at a multinational corporation.'

Examples:

He is employed at a law firm in the city center.
She is employed at a tech startup in Silicon Valley.
They are employed at a hospital in the suburbs.

Alternatives:

working at a place
hired at a place
engaged at a place
employed by a company
working for a company

Answer 1

Employed in a place

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to a general location or area.

Answer 2

Employed at a place

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to a specific company or organization.

"Employed in a place" vs "Employed at a place"

Employed in a place

Employed at a place

Related Comparisons