TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

efficiency own vs efficiency have

Both phrases are not correct as they are missing a linking verb. The correct form would be 'efficiency of one's own' or 'efficiency of having.' These phrases are commonly used to indicate possession or action.

Last updated: March 31, 2024 • 593 views

efficiency own

This phrase is incorrect as it lacks a linking verb.

The correct form would be 'efficiency of one's own' to indicate possession of efficiency.

Alternatives:

  • efficiency of one's own
  • one's own efficiency
  • efficiency possessed
  • efficiency belonging to oneself
  • efficiency that one has

efficiency have

This phrase is incorrect as it lacks a linking verb.

The correct form would be 'efficiency of having' to indicate the possession of efficiency.
  • I am glad that innovative solutions such as smart grids and ESCOs that implement investments producing a return on energy efficiency have also been included in the report.
  • Significant improvements in productivity and efficiency have also been made in recent years.
  • Great improvements in efficiency have, however, already been achieved by the implementation of the new Rules of Procedure, which entered into force from 2005.
  • Since joining the EU, renewable energy and energy efficiency have become mandatory targets in Romania as well.
  • More differentiation, more individual care, increased personal choice and especially improved efficiency have been the most important aims.
  • Promises to increase energy efficiency have multiplied, but the European Union runs the risk of not meeting the targets that have been proposed: achieving 20% by 2020.
  • Mergers and takeovers motivated by the quest for competitiveness and efficiency have grown, whether at the national or European level or globally.
  • What types of permit conditions relating to energy efficiency have typically been determined (Article 3(1)(d))?
  • Can the Commission say what joint EU-Russia annual work programmes on energy efficiency have been developed by the thematic groups?
  • Believes that renewable energy and energy efficiency have the potential to mitigate climate change, contribute to social and economic development, improve security of supply and provide environmental and health benefits;
  • It is beyond dispute that renewable energy and improvements in energy efficiency have a very important role to play here, since they reduce dependence on imports and do not produce climate-changing greenhouse gases.
  • These efficiencies have to be substantiated and must produce a net positive effect.
  • They must also describe the method(s) by which the efficiencies have been or will be achieved.
  • The data submitted must be verifiable so that there can be a sufficient degree of certainty that the efficiencies have materialised or are likely to materialise.
  • The Performance Review Body's proposed EU-wide performance targets for environment, capacity and cost-efficiency have been checked with EASA for consistency with the overriding safety objectives.
  • the efficiencies have been, or are likely to be, realised as a result of the conduct.
  • There is a need to clarify exactly when relevant information about efficiencies would have to be provided.
  • Efficiency gains have been achieved by raising and maintaining a high output per employee even at a time of significant layoffs.
  • Appropriate management controls and performance monitoring have been well applied; and efficiency gains have been realised from the organisational changes implemented during last year.
  • In particular, the objective of 20% energy efficiency will have to be made binding.

Alternatives:

  • efficiency of having
  • having efficiency
  • efficiency possessed
  • efficiency that one has
  • efficiency in possession

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!