TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

efficacy in vs efficacy on

Both 'efficacy in' and 'efficacy on' are commonly used phrases, but they are used in different contexts. 'Efficacy in' is used when referring to the effectiveness of something within a particular situation or environment, while 'efficacy on' is used when discussing the effectiveness of something in relation to a specific target or outcome.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 1510 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"efficacy in"

Use 'efficacy in' when referring to the effectiveness of something within a particular situation or environment.

Examples:

  • The efficacy of the new drug in treating the disease is being studied.
  • The efficacy of the marketing campaign in increasing sales was evident.
  • Tasigna demonstrated efficacy in patients harboring a variety of Bcr-Abl mutations associated with imatinib resistance, except T315I.
  • Safety and efficacy in children under the age of 16 has not been established.
  • The data do not demonstrate efficacy in depressive illness in this age group and show an increase in the risk of episodes of self-harm and potentially suicidal behaviour in the Seroxat group compared to placebo.
  • Lack of efficacy in controlled clinical trials
  • For anaerobic bacteria there is clinical evidence of efficacy in polymicrobial intra-abdominal infections, but no correlation between MIC values, PK/ PD data and clinical outcome.
  • Aspergillus infections - efficacy in aspergillosis patients with poor prognosis Voriconazole has in vitro fungicidal activity against Aspergillus spp.
  • Not to be administered to children under the age of 12 years, as the safety and efficacy in this population has not been established yet.
  • Aldara should not be used in children with molluscum contagiosum due to lack of efficacy in this indication (see section 5.1).
  • data on the safety and efficacy in patients under the age of 18 years.
  • Children and adolescents Lucentis is not recommended for use in children and adolescents due to a lack of data on safety and efficacy in these sub-populations.
  • The Applicant provided comprehensive published data on the use of UMAN BIG in the prophylaxis of hepatitis B in newborns from HBsAg carrier mothers, demonstrating its efficacy in this particular subset of population.
  • The main use of the referred interim analyses is in the detection of any new safety signals and as a comparison of the efficacy in relation to earlier findings.
  • In Phase II dose finding trial, the efficacy in patients with rotational cervical dystonia at three doses (10, 20 and 30 U) of Xeomin was compared to the optimal dose of Botox (30 U).
  • Paediatric population Efficib is not recommended for use in children below 18 years of age due to a lack of data on its safety and efficacy in this population.
  • However, 90 mg resulted in greater efficacy in these patients.
  • Safety and efficacy in this group has not been well established.
  • The safety and efficacy in children has not been established.
  • Safety and efficacy in paediatric patients below the age of 18 years have not been established.
  • The safety and efficacy in children and adolescents (< 18 years) have not been studied.
  • Moxifloxacin has shown efficacy in all of the approved indications.

Alternatives:

  • effectiveness in
  • efficacy within
  • efficacy within the context of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"efficacy on"

Use 'efficacy on' when discussing the effectiveness of something in relation to a specific target or outcome.

Examples:

  • The efficacy of the treatment on reducing symptoms was remarkable.
  • The efficacy of the program on improving student performance was evident.
  • This proposal is to ensure that new active substances are in future routinely tested for their efficacy on the most important tropical diseases.
  • It has already proven its efficacy on several counts, and it is essential if asylum is to gain acceptance.
  • Although the clinical significance of the induction of antibodies has not been fully elucidated, the development of neutralising antibodies is associated with reduced efficacy on clinical and MRI variables.
  • A reduction in the risk of vertebral fractures has been demonstrated, efficacy on femoral neck fractures has not been established.
  • It is important to establish that the risk potential must not be greater than that of the reference biocidal product and that the efficacy on the target organisms is consistent with the product label.
  • The conclusion of this trial was that Di Bella multitherapy did not show sufficient efficacy on patients with advanced cancer to warrant further clinical testing.
  • The Authority also noted in its assessment that plant sterols and plant stanols at daily intakes ranging from 1,5 to 3 g have a similar efficacy on lowering blood LDL-cholesterol.
  • The conclusion of this trial was that Di Bella multitherapy did not show sufficient efficacy on patients with advanced cancer to warrant further clinical testing.
  • No controlled clinical studies have been conducted on the efficacy of Cerezyme on neurological manifestations of the disease.
  • Documentation on efficacy is availablefor 54 paediatric patients.
  • Efficacy data on combination with other corticosteroids and 5-HT3 antagonists are limited.
  • Efficacy results on 229 evaluable patients showed an overall response rate (normalization of plasma uric acid levels) of 96.1%.
  • The primary evidence of efficacy was based on objective response rates.
  • The subsequent effect on efficacy is unknown.
  • Plasma concentrations were higher in females than in males, without relevant influence on efficacy.
  • See Section 5.1 for data on efficacy in patients responsive/ resistant to Botulinum Toxin Type A.
  • However, definitive conclusions on efficacy and duration of treatment cannot be drawn from these studies.
  • Consequently, the same conclusions on efficacy and safety apply to both products.
  • Any other known limitations on efficacy including resistance
  • Efficacy was based on the efficacy results from laboratory studies and the extensive use of the vaccine in the field for foxes.

Alternatives:

  • effectiveness on
  • efficacy with regard to
  • efficacy concerning

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo