TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

e-mail from vs e-mail of

Both "e-mail from" and "e-mail of" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "E-mail from" is used to indicate the sender of an e-mail, while "e-mail of" is used to indicate the owner or source of an e-mail.

Last updated: March 25, 2024 • 770 views

e-mail from

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the sender of an e-mail.

Use "e-mail from" when you want to specify the sender of an e-mail. For example, "I received an e-mail from my boss."

Examples:

  • I got an e-mail from John.
  • The e-mail from the company contained important information.
  • Who is the e-mail from?
  • She received an e-mail from her friend.
  • The e-mail from the client was very detailed.
  • You just got an e-mail from a Brian Young.
  • I got the oddest e-mail from Jane.
  • So, I got an e-mail from Robin.
  • So, I found an e-mail from whoever ordered the hit on Colston.
  • Then I got this e-mail from Butterfield.
  • Detective Prima stated on the record he never received an e-mail from Toronto.
  • She's got an e-mail from Ben.
  • It's an e-mail from a private lab in Philadelphia.
  • Did you know I got an e-mail from MacKenzie today saying...
  • I just got an e-mail from Britta Kagen.
  • I just got an e-mail from Kate.
  • So I just got an e-mail from Sue.
  • We get an e-mail from a general Ambaby mailbox.
  • I just got this e-mail from Kurt.
  • One of his colleagues said they received an e-mail from him last night.
  • - I got an e-mail from your school.
  • I just got an e-mail from Shershow.
  • He told us that you left right after you got an e-mail from Sarah.
  • We received this e-mail from a vice president of Westin Labs.
  • It's an e-mail from Pamela Raker to her sister just before she was let go.

Alternatives:

  • an e-mail from
  • email from
  • message from
  • communication from
  • correspondence from

e-mail of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the owner or source of an e-mail.

Use "e-mail of" when you want to specify the owner or source of an e-mail. For example, "The e-mail of the CEO was leaked."

Examples:

  • The e-mail of the sender was confidential.
  • I found the e-mail of the company's president.
  • What is the e-mail of the client?
  • The e-mail of the professor contained the assignment details.
  • She discovered the e-mail of her ex-boyfriend.
  • Mr Gollnisch signified his agreement in accordance with Rule 6 (3) of the Rules of Procedure by e-mail of 13 April 2005.
  • In addition, the Slovenian authorities submitted a memorandum prepared by the legal representatives of Adria by e-mail of 7 November 2012.
  • By e-mail of 3 March 2010, the Spanish authorities answered a technical question addressed to them on 26 February 2010.
  • By e-mail of 12 February 2009, the French authorities submitted as an annex to the restructuring plan a market study called The Poultry Industry and Trade, carried out by the company Xerfi in July 2008.
  • (hereinafter referred to as NAM) by e-mail of 26 February 2009,
  • Supplementary information was submitted by ISD Polska, the new owner of Gdańsk Shipyard, by e-mail of 25 January 2008.
  • By e-mail of 9 October 2007, the Italian authorities confirmed their intention and submitted a draft legal provision repealing the measure.
  • By e-mail of 24 July 2006, Italy informed the Commission that it did not have any further observations to make.
  • By e-mail of 23 September 2013 [7] Ireland provided the requested additional information and clarifications, in conformity with Commission Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU [8].
  • By e-mail of 21 January 2014, the Greek authorities informed the Commission that they agreed with the adoption of the decision in English.
  • By e-mail of 23 September 2013 [7], Hungary informed the Commission that one plant had been removed from the TNP and confirmed the correct application of the aggregation rules set out in Article 29 of Directive 2010/75/EU to the remaining plants.
  • In view of the fact that the measure had been granted to the company and of a complaint received on 9 January 2012 (see section 1.2 below), the Latvian authorities withdrew their pre-notification by e-mail of 21 February 2012.
  • Having regard to the request submitted by Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V. (hereinafter referred to as NAM) by e-mail of 26 February 2009,
  • In accordance with Article 30(5) first subparagraph, the Commission informed the Dutch authorities thereof by letter of 5 March 2009, to which the Dutch authorities answered by e-mail of 26 March 2009.
  • By e-mail of 12 February 2009, the French authorities submitted as an annex to the restructuring plan a market study called 'The Poultry Industry and Trade', carried out by the company 'Xerfi' in July 2008 [5].
  • name, address, including Member State, telephone, fax and e-mail of the competent body on whose instructions sampling was carried out;
  • (name, address, telephone, fax, e-mail of responsible officer)
  • By e-mail of 3 November 2011, Hammar Nordic Plugg AB submitted additional information to the Commission. The Commission forwarded that information to the Swedish authorities for comments on 4 November 2011.
  • Viasat submitted further information by e-mail of 26 May 2010 and by letters registered as received on 1 June 2010 and 6 July 2010.
  • The Commission also requested additional information of Sweden Post by e-mail of 30 July 2008, which was transmitted by Sweden Post by e-mail of 15 August 2008.

Alternatives:

  • an e-mail of
  • email of
  • message of
  • communication of
  • correspondence of

Related Comparisons

inpatriate vs impatriate guys from vs guys of instigators of vs stimulatos of height of vs width of have vs of constantly effort vs perserverance

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!