"Duly" vs "Duly required to"

Question

"Duly" vs "Duly required to"

Both "duly required to" and "duly" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Duly required to" is used when emphasizing that something is required or necessary, while "duly" is used to mean properly or appropriately. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that something is done in a proper or appropriate manner. It is often used in formal or legal contexts.

Examples:

The documents were duly signed by the authorized person.
The payment was duly processed by the finance department.
The report was duly submitted to the supervisor.
The contract was duly executed by both parties.
The requirements were duly met by the applicant.

This phrase is used to indicate that something is required or necessary in a formal or official manner. It emphasizes the importance of the requirement.

Examples:

Employees are duly required to attend the safety training.
Students are duly required to submit their assignments on time.
You are duly required to follow the company's code of conduct.
All participants are duly required to sign the waiver form.
Visitors are duly required to wear visitor badges at all times.

Answer 1

Duly

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to mean properly or appropriately.

Answer 2

Duly required to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to emphasize that something is required or necessary.

"Duly" vs "Duly required to"

Duly

Duly required to

Related Comparisons