"due to" vs ", due to"

Question

"due to" vs ", due to"

The phrases "due to" and ", due to" are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. "Due to" is a prepositional phrase used to show the cause or reason for something, while a comma before it is unnecessary. On the other hand, when using a comma before "due to," it is typically part of a longer sentence structure where the comma is needed for clarity or to separate clauses.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

Use "due to" to show the cause or reason for something. It is often followed by a noun or noun phrase.

Examples:

The game was canceled due to bad weather.
The delay was due to unforeseen circumstances.
The project's success was due to the team's hard work.
The event was postponed due to a scheduling conflict.
The failure was due to a lack of communication.

When using ", due to," ensure that the comma is part of a longer sentence structure where it is necessary for clarity or to separate clauses.

Examples:

The meeting was rescheduled, due to the CEO's unexpected absence.
She couldn't attend the event, due to a prior commitment.
The project was completed on time, due to the team's efficient coordination.
The decision was made, due to the new information that came to light.
The budget was revised, due to the increased costs.

Answer 1

due to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the cause or reason for something.

Answer 2

, due to

This phrase is correct when used within a specific sentence structure where a comma is needed for clarity or to separate clauses.

"due to" vs ", due to"

due to

, due to

Related Comparisons