TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

dogs could be vs dogs are could be

The phrase 'dogs could be' is correct, while 'dogs are could be' is incorrect. 'Could be' is a modal verb construction used to express possibility or uncertainty, and it should be used after the subject without any auxiliary verbs like 'are.'

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 735 views

dogs could be

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to express a possibility or uncertainty about dogs. 'Could be' is a modal verb construction that indicates a potential state or condition.

Examples:

  • Dogs could be the reason for the noise outside.
  • I think dogs could be a good addition to our family.
  • The dogs could be hiding in the backyard.
  • Do you think dogs could be trained to do that?
  • There are many reasons why dogs could be barking.
  • A dog could be in that stuff.
  • For all we know, Mango Dog could be having a two-for-one special for vets.
  • The dog could not be persuaded to go...
  • He didn't say that the dog couldn't be with me.
  • He walks dogs, so he could be anywhere.
  • Could be his dog's, could be his wife's.
  • What kind of a father could this dog ever be to a boy?
  • Now that could be a dog door, it could be someone going somewhere where they shouldn't, like a little brother into a little sister's room.
  • Now that could be a dog door, it could be someone going somewhere where they shouldn't, like a little brother into a little sister's room.
  • I imagine my dog could sneezeand blow your dog to tulsa.
  • That dog could only find Hei.
  • My dog could get an ID... from my goat.
  • Growing up, all our dogs could use the toilet.
  • If the dogs could track his scent.
  • A (Bleep) talking dog could do this.
  • The dogs couldn't have dragged him too far.
  • Dogs could have missed this easily in a car.
  • The dog couldn't have followed us here.
  • - but the dog couldn't find.
  • Even the dogs couldn't pick up a trail.

dogs are could be

This phrase is incorrect in English. The placement of 'are' before 'could be' is grammatically incorrect.

  • Three-legged dogs are the scourge of the dog community.
  • Thank goodness my dogs are barking.
  • Within 15 minutes dogs are normally awake and standing.
  • The dogs are guests of the Animal Welfare Committee.
  • Some dogs are even buried alive.
  • Some dogs are better than others, like hunting dogs.
  • Why do dog owners swear their dogs are friendly?
  • Dogs are treated using Profender modified-release tablets, which are given by mouth when the dog is fasting.
  • And if you think of dogs for example, dogs are now intentionally-designed creatures.
  • In Italy, abandoned or stray dogs are kept in shelters whose operators receive state subsidies per individual dog.
  • You know, dogs are very hygienic animals.
  • And when the dogs are hungry, they get to eat.
  • Dogs are too dependent on humans.
  • Wait, the dogs aren't blind.
  • Dogs aren't allowed in the diner.
  • Mr. Quagmire says dogs aren't allowed on the furniture.
  • 'Cause dogs are getting this bad name.
  • And dogs are right up there.
  • Okay, so the dogs are covered.
  • Dogs aren't allowed in restaurants.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!