"was not involved" vs "did not involve"

Question

"was not involved" vs "did not involve"

Both "did not involve" and "was not involved" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Did not involve" is used when referring to actions or activities that did not include someone, while "was not involved" is used when talking about someone who was not part of a particular situation or event.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone was not part of a particular situation or event.

Examples:

She was not involved in the decision-making process.
He was not involved in the accident.
They were not involved in the argument.
I was not involved in the discussion.
The company was not involved in the scandal.

Alternatives:

did not take part in
had no role in
played no part in
was not implicated in
was not connected to

This phrase is used to indicate that someone was not included in a particular action or activity.

Examples:

The decision did not involve me at all.
Her speech did not involve any personal attacks.
The project did not involve any financial risks.
The plan did not involve any complicated procedures.
The game did not involve any cheating.

Alternatives:

was not part of
was not included in
was not engaged in
was not implicated in
was not connected to

Answer 1

was not involved

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

did not involve

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"was not involved" vs "did not involve"

was not involved

did not involve

Related Comparisons