"destroy the economic balance" vs "disrupt the economic balance"

Question

"destroy the economic balance" vs "disrupt the economic balance"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'Destroy the economic balance' implies a complete and irreversible destruction of the balance, while 'disrupt the economic balance' suggests a temporary or partial disturbance. The choice between the two depends on the severity and permanence of the impact on the economic balance.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to a situation where the economic balance has been completely and irreversibly ruined or eliminated.

Examples:

The war threatened to destroy the economic balance of the region.
The sudden collapse of the currency could destroy the economic balance of the country.

Alternatives:

upset the economic balance
ruin the economic balance
shatter the economic balance
wreck the economic balance
devastate the economic balance

This phrase is used when referring to a situation where the economic balance is disturbed but not necessarily completely destroyed.

Examples:

The strike could disrupt the economic balance of the company.
The new policy might disrupt the economic balance in the market.

Alternatives:

disturb the economic balance
unsettle the economic balance
perturb the economic balance
throw off the economic balance
derange the economic balance

Answer 1

destroy the economic balance

This phrase is correct and can be used to indicate a complete and irreversible destruction of the economic balance.

Answer 2

disrupt the economic balance

This phrase is correct and is commonly used to indicate a temporary or partial disturbance of the economic balance.

"destroy the economic balance" vs "disrupt the economic balance"

destroy the economic balance

disrupt the economic balance

Related Comparisons