"defendant as the only" vs "defendant to be the only"

Question

"defendant as the only" vs "defendant to be the only"

Both phrases are not complete and do not make sense on their own. However, if we consider them in a sentence, 'defendant as the only' would be more appropriate when describing the defendant's role or position in a specific context.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase should be followed by a description or characteristic that sets the defendant apart as the only one in a particular situation.

This phrase does not convey a clear meaning on its own. It would need to be part of a larger sentence to make sense.

Answer 1

defendant as the only

This phrase can be used in a sentence to describe the defendant's role or position in a specific context.

Answer 2

defendant to be the only

This phrase is not a complete or commonly used construction in English.

"defendant as the only" vs "defendant to be the only"

defendant as the only

defendant to be the only

Related Comparisons