TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

data is evaluated in vs data is evaluated on

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Data is evaluated in' is used when referring to the criteria or factors used for evaluation, while 'Data is evaluated on' is used when referring to the specific aspects or characteristics being assessed.

Last updated: March 25, 2024 • 648 views

data is evaluated in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to the criteria or factors used for evaluating data. It indicates the context or environment in which the evaluation takes place.

Examples:

  • Data is evaluated in terms of accuracy, relevance, and completeness.
  • Data is evaluated in the context of its intended use.
  • Further data will be carefully evaluated in order to assess this impact.
  • The CHMP concluded that the data evaluated on fluoxetine has shown this medicinal product to be effective in children and adolescents with moderate to severe major depressive episodes.
  • These data should be evaluated in the context of the overall safety profile of the medicinal product, in particular to the important haematological toxicity (see section 4.8).
  • The data are evaluated by appropriate statistical methods.
  • The listed data are evaluated by appropriate statistical methods.
  • Data are evaluated using appropriate statistical methods.
  • Data on several compounds evaluated in ring tests are provided (see Appendix 1) primarily so that calibration of the method may be performed from time to time and to permit comparison of results when another method is employed.
  • Although formal validation studies of the in vitro methods covered by this testing method have not been performed, OECD experts agreed in 1999 that there was sufficient data evaluated to support the in vitro method (3).
  • data can be evaluated during signal work-up.
  • Data should be evaluated using appropriate statistical methods.
  • I evaluated Data when it applied to the Academy.
  • Product-specific data can be evaluated during signal work-up.
  • Data should be evaluated using appropriate statistical methods.
  • The safety of Ribavirin capsules is evaluated from data from three clinical trials in patients with no previous exposure to interferon (interferon-naïve patients): two trials studied Ribavirin in combination with interferon alfa-2b, one trial studied Ribavirin in combination with peginterferon alfa-2b.
  • The safety of Rebetol capsules is evaluated from data from three clinical trials in patients with no previous exposure to interferon (interferon-naïve patients): two trials studied Rebetol in combination with interferon alfa-2b, one trial studied Rebetol in combination with peginterferon alfa-2b.
  • This new data has been evaluated and it is considered appropriate to revise the provisional maximum residue levels fixed for these products in Directive 1999/71/EC.
  • For example, the data may be evaluated by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) approach with body weight at necropsy as the co-variable.
  • Consequently, according to the data collated and evaluated by the Treatment Centre, this category of users is almost non-existent.
  • An 18-month period is not necessary to renew a product's authorisation, unless there are new data to be evaluated.
  • XX1996.IEV: Contents of evaluated data on increment (optional)

Alternatives:

  • Data is evaluated based on
  • Data is evaluated according to

data is evaluated on

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to the specific aspects or characteristics being assessed during the evaluation of data. It indicates the focus or subject of the evaluation.

Examples:

  • Data is evaluated on its quality and reliability.
  • Data is evaluated on a set of predefined criteria.
  • The CHMP concluded that the data evaluated on fluoxetine has shown this medicinal product to be effective in children and adolescents with moderate to severe major depressive episodes.
  • The data are evaluated by appropriate statistical methods.
  • The listed data are evaluated by appropriate statistical methods.
  • Data are evaluated using appropriate statistical methods.
  • Although formal validation studies of the in vitro methods covered by this testing method have not been performed, OECD experts agreed in 1999 that there was sufficient data evaluated to support the in vitro method (3).
  • data can be evaluated during signal work-up.
  • Data should be evaluated using appropriate statistical methods.
  • I evaluated Data when it applied to the Academy.
  • Product-specific data can be evaluated during signal work-up.
  • Data should be evaluated using appropriate statistical methods.
  • The safety of Ribavirin capsules is evaluated from data from three clinical trials in patients with no previous exposure to interferon (interferon-naïve patients): two trials studied Ribavirin in combination with interferon alfa-2b, one trial studied Ribavirin in combination with peginterferon alfa-2b.
  • The safety of Rebetol capsules is evaluated from data from three clinical trials in patients with no previous exposure to interferon (interferon-naïve patients): two trials studied Rebetol in combination with interferon alfa-2b, one trial studied Rebetol in combination with peginterferon alfa-2b.
  • Further data will be carefully evaluated in order to assess this impact.
  • This new data has been evaluated and it is considered appropriate to revise the provisional maximum residue levels fixed for these products in Directive 1999/71/EC.
  • For example, the data may be evaluated by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) approach with body weight at necropsy as the co-variable.
  • Consequently, according to the data collated and evaluated by the Treatment Centre, this category of users is almost non-existent.
  • An 18-month period is not necessary to renew a product's authorisation, unless there are new data to be evaluated.
  • XX1996.IEV: Contents of evaluated data on increment (optional)
  • These data will be re-evaluated annually and outcomes reported and discussed within the Annual Reassessments.
  • If data are available from studies carried out with doses higher than the above limit dose, this data must be evaluated together with other relevant data.

Alternatives:

  • Data is evaluated based on
  • Data is evaluated according to

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!