Which one is correct?
"damage to substrate" or "damage on substrate"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"damage to substrate" or "damage on substrate"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

This phrase is used to describe the impact or effect of the damage on the substrate itself.

Examples:

The water damage to the substrate was extensive.
The fire caused significant damage to the substrate.
The impact of the explosion caused damage to the substrate.
The corrosion led to damage to the substrate.
The heat exposure resulted in damage to the substrate.

Alternatives:

damage affecting the substrate
damage impacting the substrate
damage harming the substrate
damage causing harm to the substrate
damage resulting in harm to the substrate

This phrase is used to describe physical damage that is directly visible on the surface of the substrate.

Examples:

The scratch on the substrate was clearly visible.
There was a dent on the substrate.
The crack on the substrate was extensive.
The stain on the substrate was difficult to remove.
The burn mark on the substrate was caused by a chemical reaction.

Alternatives:

damage on the surface of the substrate
damage on the material
damage on the object
damage on the item
damage on the component

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Damage on substrate' is used when referring to physical damage that is visibly present on the surface of the substrate. 'Damage to substrate' is used when describing the impact or effect of the damage on the substrate itself.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024