"credits to" vs "credited to"

Question

"credits to" vs "credited to"

Both 'credits to' and 'credited to' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Credits to' is used when acknowledging someone for their contribution or work, while 'credited to' is used when assigning recognition or acknowledgment to someone or something.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

You can use 'credits to' when giving recognition or acknowledgment to someone for their work or contribution.

Examples:

Credits to John for his outstanding performance in the play.
The success of the project is credits to the hardworking team.
Credits to the author for the insightful book.
The beautiful artwork is credits to the talented artist.
The victory is credits to the team's dedication and effort.

Alternatives:

thanks to
acknowledgments to
recognition to
kudos to
praise to

You can use 'credited to' when assigning recognition or acknowledgment to someone or something for a particular achievement or work.

Examples:

The success of the project is credited to the hardworking team.
The discovery of the new species is credited to the biologist.
The growth of the company is credited to the innovative strategies.
The masterpiece is credited to the renowned artist.
The victory is credited to the team's perseverance and teamwork.

Alternatives:

attributed to
ascribed to
assigned to
given credit to
recognized as

Answer 1

credits to

This phrase is correct and commonly used when acknowledging someone for their contribution or work.

Answer 2

credited to

This phrase is correct and commonly used when assigning recognition or acknowledgment to someone or something.

"credits to" vs "credited to"

credits to

credited to

Related Comparisons