"covered by a purchase order" vs "covered with a purchase order"

Question

"covered by a purchase order" vs "covered with a purchase order"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Covered by a purchase order' is the more common and appropriate phrase to use when referring to something that is included or paid for by a purchase order. On the other hand, 'covered with a purchase order' could be used in a more literal sense, such as physically having a purchase order placed on top of something.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is used when something is included or paid for by a purchase order. It indicates that the purchase order provides coverage for the specified item or service.

Examples:

The cost of the equipment is covered by a purchase order.
All expenses related to the project are covered by a purchase order.
The services rendered by the supplier are covered by a purchase order.

Alternatives:

included in a purchase order
specified in a purchase order
paid for by a purchase order
accounted for in a purchase order
authorized by a purchase order

This phrase could be used in a more literal sense, such as physically having a purchase order placed on top of something. It is not as commonly used in business or formal contexts.

Examples:

The desk was covered with a purchase order.
The files were covered with a purchase order for protection.
She found her notes covered with a purchase order.

Alternatives:

placed on top of a purchase order
protected by a purchase order
adorned with a purchase order
decorated with a purchase order
wrapped in a purchase order

Answer 1

covered by a purchase order

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

covered with a purchase order

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

"covered by a purchase order" vs "covered with a purchase order"

covered by a purchase order

covered with a purchase order

Related Comparisons