⚡ Black Friday Offer: Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"costs have" vs "costs has"

The correct phrase is "costs have." In English, "costs" is a plural noun, so it should be followed by the plural form of the verb, which is "have." "Costs has" is incorrect because it uses the singular form of the verb with a plural subject.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 1007 views

"costs have"

This phrase is correct. In English, "costs" is a plural noun, so it should be followed by the plural form of the verb, which is "have."

Use "costs have" when referring to multiple costs. For example, "The costs have increased significantly this year."

Examples:

  • The costs have risen sharply.
  • These costs have been carefully calculated.
  • All the costs have been accounted for.
  • The costs have exceeded our budget.
  • The costs have not been finalized yet.
  • "Cost effective" is what they say.
  • In fact, in the aftermath of this transaction, MAVA's "costs" (i.e. the interest payment to MFB) could not be covered by Malév's royalty payments for the trademark.
  • «Cost-effectiveness» means that the costs of producing ESCB statistics must be in proportion to their merits and that resources must be used optimally.
  • This is due to the fact that the market system requires that "cost efficiency" or the need to reduce expenses exists at every stage of production.
  • That "liberty" cost me plenty!
  • "costs" means proportionate costs which are justified under this Directive by the need to ensure the proper and effective prevention or restoration of environmental damage;
  • On roads in mountainous regions and conurbations, a "mark-up" cost is introduced (amendment 37 adopted).
  • The European Parliament has also long called for harmonized penalties, sufficient to be dissuasive, instead of a simple "cost of doing business".
  • «cost effectiveness» meaning that the costs of producing statistics must be in proportion to the importance of the results and the benefits sought, that resources must be optimally used and the response burden minimised.
  • The main ground for this classification was the «cost of capital principle».
  • Such commitments or guarantees of operation are normally referred to as "stranded costs".
  • "cost-optimal level" means the level
  • "External costs" are those clearly caused by the road freight system but not calculated in the market price of their services.
  • The Commission believes that in general there are good reasons for the "eligible costs" approach.
  • A particular obstacle to the provision of equity capital can be the high transaction and "due diligence" costs relative to the amount of capital being provided.
  • Wait, did you say "unit costs" or "unicorns"?
  • Accordingly, it was decided to base the "cost of acquisition" exclusively on the costs incurred by the sampled producers, these costs still being allocated to the products in the way described in the last sentence of recital 46 of the provisional Regulation.
  • "external costs": costs being clearly caused by the road freight system, but not calculated in the market prices of their services.
  • A clear and unambiguous definition of "overall costs" as the basis of ARTEMIS's financial contribution to the running costs is needed.
  • The emoluments of the members of the Executive Board are set out in note 29 «Staff costs» of the Annual Accounts.

"costs has"

This phrase is incorrect. It uses the singular form of the verb with a plural subject, which is a grammatical error in English.

  • "eligible costs" has the same meaning as in Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012;
  • "Cost effective" is what they say.
  • In fact, in the aftermath of this transaction, MAVA's "costs" (i.e. the interest payment to MFB) could not be covered by Malév's royalty payments for the trademark.
  • «Cost-effectiveness» means that the costs of producing ESCB statistics must be in proportion to their merits and that resources must be used optimally.
  • This is due to the fact that the market system requires that "cost efficiency" or the need to reduce expenses exists at every stage of production.
  • That "liberty" cost me plenty!
  • "costs" means proportionate costs which are justified under this Directive by the need to ensure the proper and effective prevention or restoration of environmental damage;
  • On roads in mountainous regions and conurbations, a "mark-up" cost is introduced (amendment 37 adopted).
  • The European Parliament has also long called for harmonized penalties, sufficient to be dissuasive, instead of a simple "cost of doing business".
  • «cost effectiveness» meaning that the costs of producing statistics must be in proportion to the importance of the results and the benefits sought, that resources must be optimally used and the response burden minimised.
  • The main ground for this classification was the «cost of capital principle».
  • Such commitments or guarantees of operation are normally referred to as "stranded costs".
  • "cost-optimal level" means the level
  • "External costs" are those clearly caused by the road freight system but not calculated in the market price of their services.
  • The Commission believes that in general there are good reasons for the "eligible costs" approach.
  • A particular obstacle to the provision of equity capital can be the high transaction and "due diligence" costs relative to the amount of capital being provided.
  • Wait, did you say "unit costs" or "unicorns"?
  • Accordingly, it was decided to base the "cost of acquisition" exclusively on the costs incurred by the sampled producers, these costs still being allocated to the products in the way described in the last sentence of recital 46 of the provisional Regulation.
  • "external costs": costs being clearly caused by the road freight system, but not calculated in the market prices of their services.
  • A clear and unambiguous definition of "overall costs" as the basis of ARTEMIS's financial contribution to the running costs is needed.

Related Comparisons

wake vs awake betake vs undertake essences vs essennce face cover vs face-cover saleslady vs saleswoman theta dream vs thetareves

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

⚡️ Black Friday 2024 ⚡️

Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!