"costs for" vs "costs of"

Question

"costs for" vs "costs of"

Both 'costs for' and 'costs of' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Costs for' is used when referring to the purpose or reason for the costs, while 'costs of' is used to indicate what the costs are related to or associated with.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

Use 'costs for' when referring to the purpose or reason for the costs. For example, 'These are the costs for repairing the car.'

Examples:

The costs for the event were covered by the sponsors.
What are the costs for shipping this package?
She is calculating the costs for renovating the house.

Alternatives:

expenses for
charges for
fees for
prices for
payments for

Use 'costs of' when indicating what the costs are related to or associated with. For example, 'These are the costs of maintaining the building.'

Examples:

The costs of the project exceeded the budget.
What are the costs of living in this city?
She is aware of the costs of running a business.

Alternatives:

expenses of
charges of
fees of
prices of
payments of

Answer 1

costs for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

costs of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"costs for" vs "costs of"

costs for

costs of

Related Comparisons