TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

cosmetic tests vs cosmetics tests

Both "cosmetic tests" and "cosmetics tests" can be correct, depending on the context. "Cosmetic tests" refers to tests related to cosmetics in general, while "cosmetics tests" specifically refers to tests conducted on cosmetics.

Last updated: April 01, 2024 • 592 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"cosmetic tests"

This phrase refers to tests related to cosmetics in general, such as testing the effectiveness of a cosmetic product or its safety.

Examples:

  • The company conducted cosmetic tests to ensure the safety of their new skincare line.
  • She participated in cosmetic tests to evaluate the performance of different makeup products.
  • Is it really necessary to test cosmetics on them?
  • Some countries prescribe that certain substances may only be used in cosmetic products if tests have been carried out on animals.
  • For topical cosmetics, do not test on animals, the environment good prescription.
  • Later this week the European Parliament will debate a report about the Commission's failure to agree plans to phase out animal tests on cosmetics.
  • The Commission has asked a group of 41 experts to draw up a report on the development and reliability of alternative methods for tests on cosmetics (i.e. without animal testing).
  • Although retaining a marketing ban, the Council has rejected adoption of a fixed date for banning the use of animals to test cosmetics within the Community, as supported by both the Commission and the Parliament.
  • Mr President, at first sight, the ban on animal experiments to test cosmetics or the substances of which they are composed should be a matter of consensus, as each of us is naturally opposed to any act of cruelty to animals.
  • The existing provisions banning animal testing for finished cosmetic products as of 2004, with a phasing-out period for animal tests on cosmetic ingredients by 2009/2013, are unaffected by the new regulation.
  • As the Commission notes in its report COM(2007)232 of 3 May 2007, chemicals are rarely tested on animals solely for their use as ingredients in cosmetics and most animal tests are carried out for multiple uses.
  • We draw attention to the fact that it is not actually known how many tests for cosmetics within the European Union involve the use of animals since most Member States are failing to comply with the obligation to collect those statistics, including Germany.
  • Concerning animal testing, the Parliament was clear that the Commission proposal to replace the existing marketing ban with a Community-wide ban on the use of animals to test cosmetics was totally unsatisfactory.
  • No dog track rabbit should be used to test cosmetics, no robot cow should have to be milked by a milking machine, and no milking machine should have to milk a robot cow.
  • It should be possible to provide consumers with information relating to tests performed on cosmetic products.
  • Therefore, it is now reasonable to introduce a total animal test ban for cosmetics.
  • Parliament has been seeking for years to abolish animal tests in the cosmetics industry.
  • Australia - Cosmetics: Bill to eliminate tests on animals
  • Herbalist, orthopaedics, homoeopathy, cosmetics, baby products and blood tests.
  • Numerous different tests for the determination of the antioxidant capacity of food or cosmetics exist.
  • The Polish cosmetics industry consists mainly of small and medium-sized enterprises which cannot afford to carry out the complicated tests needed to introduce substitute substances in many cosmetics.
  • To this end, it continues to be indispensable to carry out certain toxicological tests to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products.

Alternatives:

  • tests related to cosmetics
  • cosmetic testing
  • cosmetics testing
  • cosmetic product tests
  • cosmetics product testing

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"cosmetics tests"

This phrase specifically refers to tests conducted on cosmetics, such as quality control tests or safety assessments of cosmetic products.

Examples:

  • The lab performed cosmetics tests to check for any harmful ingredients in the new makeup line.
  • Before launching the product, they conducted rigorous cosmetics tests to ensure its quality.
  • Is it really necessary to test cosmetics on them?
  • Some countries prescribe that certain substances may only be used in cosmetic products if tests have been carried out on animals.
  • For topical cosmetics, do not test on animals, the environment good prescription.
  • Later this week the European Parliament will debate a report about the Commission's failure to agree plans to phase out animal tests on cosmetics.
  • The Commission has asked a group of 41 experts to draw up a report on the development and reliability of alternative methods for tests on cosmetics (i.e. without animal testing).
  • Although retaining a marketing ban, the Council has rejected adoption of a fixed date for banning the use of animals to test cosmetics within the Community, as supported by both the Commission and the Parliament.
  • Mr President, at first sight, the ban on animal experiments to test cosmetics or the substances of which they are composed should be a matter of consensus, as each of us is naturally opposed to any act of cruelty to animals.
  • The existing provisions banning animal testing for finished cosmetic products as of 2004, with a phasing-out period for animal tests on cosmetic ingredients by 2009/2013, are unaffected by the new regulation.
  • As the Commission notes in its report COM(2007)232 of 3 May 2007, chemicals are rarely tested on animals solely for their use as ingredients in cosmetics and most animal tests are carried out for multiple uses.
  • We draw attention to the fact that it is not actually known how many tests for cosmetics within the European Union involve the use of animals since most Member States are failing to comply with the obligation to collect those statistics, including Germany.
  • Concerning animal testing, the Parliament was clear that the Commission proposal to replace the existing marketing ban with a Community-wide ban on the use of animals to test cosmetics was totally unsatisfactory.
  • No dog track rabbit should be used to test cosmetics, no robot cow should have to be milked by a milking machine, and no milking machine should have to milk a robot cow.
  • It should be possible to provide consumers with information relating to tests performed on cosmetic products.
  • Therefore, it is now reasonable to introduce a total animal test ban for cosmetics.
  • Parliament has been seeking for years to abolish animal tests in the cosmetics industry.
  • Australia - Cosmetics: Bill to eliminate tests on animals
  • Herbalist, orthopaedics, homoeopathy, cosmetics, baby products and blood tests.
  • Numerous different tests for the determination of the antioxidant capacity of food or cosmetics exist.
  • The Polish cosmetics industry consists mainly of small and medium-sized enterprises which cannot afford to carry out the complicated tests needed to introduce substitute substances in many cosmetics.
  • To this end, it continues to be indispensable to carry out certain toxicological tests to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products.

Alternatives:

  • tests on cosmetics
  • cosmetics testing procedures
  • cosmetic product testing
  • cosmetics quality control tests
  • cosmetics safety assessments

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo