"corroborate with" vs "corroborate to"

Question

"corroborate with" vs "corroborate to"

Both 'corroborate with' and 'corroborate to' are commonly used phrases in English, but they are used in different contexts. 'Corroborate with' is used when referring to evidence or testimony that supports a statement or finding, while 'corroborate to' is less common and may be considered less standard in English.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

Use 'corroborate with' when referring to evidence or testimony that supports a statement or finding. It indicates a connection or agreement between the corroborating element and the statement.

Examples:

The witness was able to corroborate the suspect's alibi with her testimony.
The data from the study corroborates with the hypothesis proposed by the researchers.

Alternatives:

support with
confirm with
validate with
substantiate with
back up with

Use 'corroborate to' when you want to express similarity or comparison between two things. It is less standard than 'corroborate with' and may not be as commonly used.

Examples:

The new evidence corroborates to the findings of the previous study.
Her story corroborated to the version told by the other witness.

Alternatives:

correspond to
compare to
resemble to
be similar to
be akin to

Answer 1

corroborate with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

corroborate to

This phrase is correct but less common in English.

"corroborate with" vs "corroborate to"

corroborate with

corroborate to

Related Comparisons