🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

confidence interval for vs confidence interval of

Both 'confidence interval for' and 'confidence interval of' are commonly used and correct in English. The choice between them depends on the context and personal preference.

Last updated: March 31, 2024 • 492 views

confidence interval for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to the range of values that is likely to include a population parameter. For example, 'We calculated a confidence interval for the mean weight of the population.'

Examples:

  • The confidence interval for the proportion of voters in favor of the new policy is between 45% and 55%.
  • Can you calculate the confidence interval for the median income of the sample?
  • Researchers often report a confidence interval for the effect size of a study.
  • The CONFIDENCE() function returns the confidence interval for a population mean.
  • A higher confidence interval for OTC derivatives is typically justified because those products can suffer from less reliable pricing and shorter runs of historical data on which to base exposure estimations.
  • The half-length of the confidence interval for each indicator shall not exceed the threshold provided in paragraph 3 unless an effective sample size larger than 5000 individuals is required at national level.
  • The net sample (excluding unit non-response) should provide estimates within a 95 % confidence interval for a set of indicators listed in paragraph 3.
  • 95 % confidence interval for the LD50 (where this can be provided),
  • In calculating a confidence interval for any ECx the variability among vessels should be taken into account, or it should be shown that this variability is so small that it can be ignored.
  • For the determination of the adequate confidence interval for each class of financial instruments it clears, a CCP shall in addition consider at least the following factors:
  • CI = confidence interval; ITT = intent-to-treat; N = total population size. a Statistically significant for noninferiority, with the entire confidence interval for HR well below the 1.17645 noninferiority margin (p < 0.001).
  • the mean, the total number of observations (before and after imputation), the coefficient of variation and the 95 % confidence interval for income components
  • Otherwise, although it will still be possible to estimate the EC50, the confidence interval for the EC50 will be very wide and it may not be possible to satisfactorily assess the adequacy of the fitted model;
  • Micafungin rate minus the liposomal amphotericin B rate, and 2-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference in overall success rate based on large sample normal approximation.

Alternatives:

  • confidence interval of

confidence interval of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is also used when discussing the range of values that is likely to include a population parameter. For example, 'The confidence interval of the population mean is 95%.'

Examples:

  • What is the confidence interval of the true population proportion?
  • The study provided a confidence interval of 2 to 5 for the average response time.
  • The confidence interval of the regression coefficient was quite narrow.
  • In the first step the error value of the power is to be determined as a standard deviation being equivalent to a confidence interval of 68 %.
  • The position of vessels shall be determined with a margin of error of less than 500 metres and a confidence interval of 99 %.
  • For consignments containing more than 130 packages, a sample of 65 packages randomly selected from the consignment must be inspected to achieve a 95 % confidence interval of detecting 5 % incidence of disease.
  • for serological testing on a number of pigs sufficient to detect a prevalence of swine vesicular disease of 5 % with a confidence interval of 95 %;
  • In the case of livestock surveys, the sampling errors for the results of each Member State shall not exceed (with a confidence interval of 68 %):
  • 95 % confidence interval of the geometric mean.
  • 95 % confidence interval of the 95th percentile.
  • It is also recommended to calculate the 95 % confidence interval of the mean value.
  • Regarding the 20 mg group, this effect is significant as well, according to ICH guidelines, with upper confidence interval of 10 - 12 ms.
  • The value u2σ is the upper bound of the 2σ confidence interval of the maximum resultant induced air speeds in the x-y platform plane.
  • This 18 month difference was statistically significant with a hazard ratio of reduction of risk of death in the MPT arm of 0.59, 97.5% confidence interval of 0.42-0.84 and p-value of < 0.001 (see Figure 1).
  • The format of the error value is to be a standard deviation being equivalent to a two-sided confidence interval of 84 % (see formula (3)).
  • where c is equal to 1,96 for a confidence interval of 0,95.
  • values specified and guaranteed by the supplier of a material where the operator can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that the carbon content exhibits a 95 % confidence interval of not more than 1 %;
  • The Kaplan-Meier estimate for continued sustained response over 5 years for all patients is 97% with a 95% Confidence Interval of [95%, 99%].
  • 2. For each of the Member States, sampling errors for the results of the surveys provided for in Article 2 (2) shall not exceed 2 % (confidence interval of 68 %) of the total number of pigs.
  • The Kaplan-Meier estimate for continued sustained response over 5 years for all patients is 97% with a 95% Confidence Interval of [95%, 99%].

Alternatives:

  • confidence interval for

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!