🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

conduct a review vs to have a review

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Conduct a review' is commonly used when someone is responsible for carrying out a review or assessment, while 'to have a review' is more general and can refer to being involved in a review process without necessarily leading it.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 5465 views

conduct a review

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when someone is responsible for carrying out a review or assessment. It implies taking an active role in the review process.

Examples:

  • The manager will conduct a review of the project next week.
  • The committee will conduct a review of the company's policies.
  • It is important to conduct a review of the safety procedures regularly.
  • The Commission should conduct a review after a reasonably long length of time to assess if any adjustments to the legislation are necessary.
  • It would be better, therefore, to conduct a review after a reasonably long length of time to assess if any adjustments to the legislation are necessary.
  • At least once a year, the institution must conduct a review of its overall risk-management process.
  • The Commission should, by 30 June 2015, conduct a review of this Directive in the light of the experience gained in the early phase of its implementation and make proposals for its revision as appropriate.
  • New resources must be found for new requirements and so it is becoming necessary to conduct a review of the current financial framework that was decided on in Berlin.
  • The Commission considers it appropriate to conduct a review after at least one year of implementation, so not before the second half of 2008, in order to allow the US to gain sufficient experience with the new Agreement and Assurances.
  • Calls on the Commission to conduct a review of the relationship between the current regulations on social security coordination and free movement, covering both economically inactive citizens and workers, to be accompanied if necessary by legislative amendments;
  • Stresses that the Commission should conduct a review of all the existing agencies with a view to proposing possible amendments to their basic instruments so as to adapt them to the models to be defined for the purposes of the future regulatory framework;
  • Will the Commission conduct a review of its strategy on fighting counterfeited and pirated goods in the light of the EU2020 strategy and the Monti report?
  • At least once a year, the institution must conduct a review of its overall risk-management process.
  • Whenever a special agent takes over an operation, they conduct a review.
  • By 31 December 2015, the Commission shall conduct a review of the application of this Decision.
  • The MAH conduct a review of the safety data obtained with the current formulation of STAMARIL in all clinical trials.
  • In these circumstances, it would appear reasonable to conduct a review of progress after 3 years.
  • EBA shall conduct a review of compliance with the guidelines whenever the scheme is changed and at periodic intervals which shall not exceed five years.
  • By 31 December 2015, the Commission shall conduct a review of the application of this radio spectrum policy programme.
  • By 31 December 2014, the Commission shall conduct a review of the provisions of this Article.
  • The Council shall conduct a review, in particular, of the practical application of the provisions of this Framework Decision by Member States.
  • By 31 December 2015, the Commission shall conduct a review of the application of this Decision.
  • It is also important to conduct a review of existing legal and regulatory frameworks for the safety and protection of nuclear installations.

Alternatives:

  • perform a review
  • carry out a review
  • undertake a review
  • conduct an assessment
  • conduct an evaluation

to have a review

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is more general and can refer to being involved in a review process without necessarily leading it. It implies being part of the review process.

Examples:

  • I will have a review with my supervisor next week.
  • The team will have a review of their performance at the end of the month.
  • It is important to have a review of the project before finalizing it.
  • We have made some progress in the past, and the IAS recently announced that they were going to have a review of their own constitution.
  • Those new Members will not have our expertise in this matter, and that is why I would have preferred to have seen a review within the lifetime of this Parliament.
  • The EESC finds it unacceptable to have a special review clause applying only to Mediterranean products.
  • I have to appear before a review board this afternoon.
  • Heard they voted to have a civilian review board look at it.
  • Heard they voted to have a civilian review board look at it.
  • Despite repeated calls by myself and others to have a full review of Israel's compliance with human rights provisions, nothing tangible has been done, to my knowledge.
  • It also proposes to have a later review of the Directive - in 2006 and not in 2004 - to include for the second period more sectors and activities.
  • I feel it is particularly important to have a systematic review of the effectiveness of the neighbourhood policy in the mirror of the Georgian events.
  • Furthermore, the opportunity exists for the parties in question to have a corresponding review carried out in the event of discrimination.
  • Article 22, paragraph 3 also states that the concentration acquires a Community dimension if all the competent Member States, or at least three of them, have agreed to a review by the Commission.
  • What we do know is that something very serious happened this summer and that we shall have to undertake a thorough review of the arrangements for monitoring catches.
  • It proposes to have a later review of the Directive - in 2006 and not in 2004 - to include for the second period more sectors and activities (like the transport sector and the households, for instance).
  • Legal compliance is a key requirement of the EMAS regulation and an organisation cannot register without it, so it has to have a procedure to review and evaluate this regularly.
  • Moreover, it is highly burdensome with minimal benefit to have retrospective review after a 4 year project if there is to be a mid-project review at 3 years.
  • We should have liked to have seen a more comprehensive review and, above all, a report by the Commission noting what has really been achieved during the last few years.
  • In the area of financial services, for example, the Commission intends to have a mid-term review meeting in February next year to stimulate more political interest in perfecting the internal market and achieving the difficult targets we were set by the Lisbon European Council.
  • The report is the response to a request by the European Council to have a six-monthly review of the implementation of the action plan on counter-terrorism adopted in June 2004 and last amended in February 2006.
  • Through the New Partnership for Africa's Development, NEPAD, African leaders have agreed to a peer review mechanism which many developed world governments, many governments in Europe, would find uncomfortably intrusive.
  • have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to the public participation provisions of this Article.

Alternatives:

  • participate in a review
  • be involved in a review
  • attend a review
  • undergo a review
  • go through a review

Related Comparisons

conduct a project vs complete a project make review vs conduct review do a review vs make a review doing a final review vs making a final review doing a final review vs carrying out a final review

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!