companies who vs companies that

Both 'companies who' and 'companies that' are commonly used in English, but they are used in different contexts. 'Companies who' is used when referring to companies as if they were people, emphasizing the human aspect. On the other hand, 'companies that' is used when referring to companies as entities or objects. The choice between the two depends on whether you want to emphasize the human aspect or simply refer to the companies.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 2202 views

companies who

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to companies as if they were people, emphasizing the human aspect.

Use 'companies who' when referring to companies as if they were people, emphasizing the human aspect. For example, 'I prefer to work with companies who value their employees.'

Examples:

I prefer to work with companies who value their employees.
Companies who invest in employee training tend to have higher retention rates.
I admire companies who prioritize sustainability in their business practices.
Companies who focus on customer satisfaction are more likely to succeed.
I trust companies who are transparent about their operations.

Show examples from the web [+]

I harbor p.O. Boxes for companies who want to remain anonymous.
As of right now, these are the companies who will be participating in the auction.
You talk a lot about the social responsibility of companies who, after all, are only playing by the rules that you have put in place.
I could quote so many companies who are fighting to export, with a great part of their activities depending on exports.
And all the companies who bill you have your addresses.
We have 4,000 companies who are members.
In case of the UK survey, 21 out of 31 UK companies who replied to the interview had also other than PV activities.
The moral ethics of the companies who offer them at reduced cost were called into question.
There are more than a few companies who could use a guy with your skills.
Our personal information is now owned by many companies who frequently make use of our private data without due permission.
There are many companies who also charge people for damage that has not occurred or is very minor.
Most particularly it seeks to do that by imposing sanctions on individuals and companies who contravene the US law.
It also appears that there are unacceptable links between the State Agency and the companies who did the projects, which might indicate conflict of interests.
A letter is sent out to companies who have recently obtained UK patents.
What does the EU intend to do to protect the competitiveness of those companies who do not receive any EU subsidies at all? 5.
It worries us that there is still government interference in the actions of companies who are seeking appropriate dimensions and competitiveness at a European level.
For those companies who are subject to laws imposed by parliaments and states, the employment market is not only European, but world-wide.
If the two companies who started production during the period are added, the total market share increases by 6 %.
Ensure effective prosecution of individuals and companies who participated in the 'pyramid' tax evasion schemes.
Now I would like to take one recent example, amongst so many of those big companies who make their workers redundant at a time when they are experiencing increased profits.

Alternatives:

companies that
companies which
companies whose
companies in which
companies on which

companies that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to companies as entities or objects.

Use 'companies that' when referring to companies as entities or objects. For example, 'The companies that operate in this industry are highly competitive.'