TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

CI=%95 vs CI=95%

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings. "ci=%95" seems to be a typo or an incorrect format, while "ci=95%" is the correct way to express a confidence interval percentage. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last updated: March 19, 2024 • 1234 views

CI=%95

This is not a correct or commonly used construction in English.

This phrase seems to be a typo or an incorrect format. It does not convey a clear meaning in English.
  • The CI-95 uses the highly effective and time proven active impaction method. This collects air through a perforated head, and microorganisms are impacted onto ...
  • Mar 1, 2011 ... Profesionální loknovací kulma Remington Ci 95 s luxusními odlesky perel pro vláčné vlny zajistí, že váš účes bude 8× hladší a 5× trvalejší!
  • <0.001 1.947 (1.436-2.640). <0.001. Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; Univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards ...
  • Sep 9, 2015 ... CI 95% for standardized regression coefficient. No problem. We won't show you that ad again. Why didn't you like it? Uninteresting; Misleading

CI=95%

This is the correct way to express a confidence interval percentage.

This phrase is commonly used in statistics to indicate a confidence interval percentage.
  • The CI-95 uses the highly effective and time proven active impaction method. This collects air through a perforated head, and microorganisms are impacted onto ...
  • Mar 1, 2011 ... Profesionální loknovací kulma Remington Ci 95 s luxusními odlesky perel pro vláčné vlny zajistí, že váš účes bude 8× hladší a 5× trvalejší!
  • <0.001 1.947 (1.436-2.640). <0.001. Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; Univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards ...
  • Sep 9, 2015 ... CI 95% for standardized regression coefficient. No problem. We won't show you that ad again. Why didn't you like it? Uninteresting; Misleading

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!