TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

Changes has been merge vs Changes has been merged

The correct phrase is "changes have been merged." The verb "have" should be used with the plural subject "changes," and the past participle "merged" is the correct form to use in this context.

Last updated: March 17, 2024

Changes has been merge

This phrase is incorrect. The verb "has" should be replaced with "have" to match the plural subject "changes." Additionally, the past participle should be "merged" instead of "merge."

The correct form is "changes have been merged." Use this structure when referring to multiple changes that have been combined or integrated.

Alternatives:

  • changes have been merged
  • the changes have been merged
  • these changes have been merged
  • all changes have been merged
  • various changes have been merged

Changes has been merged

This phrase is correct. It uses the correct subject-verb agreement with "changes" and the past participle "merged."

This phrase is suitable for describing multiple changes that have been combined or integrated.

Alternatives:

  • changes have been merged
  • the changes have been merged
  • these changes have been merged
  • all changes have been merged
  • various changes have been merged

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!