"lead to a delay" vs "cause a delay"

Question

"lead to a delay" vs "cause a delay"

Both "cause a delay" and "lead to a delay" are correct phrases that can be used interchangeably. They both convey the idea that something results in a delay. The choice between the two can depend on personal preference or the specific context in which they are used.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

This phrase is used to suggest that a particular action or event has resulted in a delay in a process or schedule.

Examples:

The strike led to a delay in the delivery of the goods.
The bad weather conditions led to a delay in the construction work.

Alternatives:

caused a delay
resulted in a delay
brought about a delay
contributed to a delay
brought on a delay

This phrase is used to explain that a particular action or event is responsible for a delay in a process or schedule.

Examples:

The heavy traffic caused a delay in our arrival.
Technical issues caused a delay in the project timeline.

Alternatives:

resulted in a delay
brought about a delay
contributed to a delay
brought on a delay
led to a delay

Answer 1

lead to a delay

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something results in a delay.

Answer 2

cause a delay

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something is the reason for a delay.

"lead to a delay" vs "cause a delay"

lead to a delay

cause a delay

Related Comparisons