"cannot be connected" vs "are not communicable"

Question

"cannot be connected" vs "are not communicable"

The phrases "cannot be connected" and "are not communicable" are not directly comparable as they convey different meanings. "Cannot be connected" implies a physical or technical inability to establish a connection, while "are not communicable" refers to the inability to transmit or share information or ideas. Therefore, the choice between the two depends on the context in which you want to convey the message.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to situations where two or more things or systems are unable to be linked or joined together physically or technically.

Examples:

The two pipes cannot be connected due to their different sizes.
The devices cannot be connected wirelessly.
The circuits cannot be connected in parallel.

Alternatives:

cannot be linked
cannot be attached
cannot be joined

This phrase is used when indicating that information, ideas, or diseases cannot be transmitted or shared between individuals or entities.

Examples:

The complexity of the topic makes it difficult to explain, so the ideas are not communicable.
The disease is not communicable through casual contact.
The emotions she felt were not communicable to others.

Alternatives:

are not transmittable
are not shareable
are not transferable

Answer 1

cannot be connected

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a physical or technical inability to establish a connection.

Answer 2

are not communicable

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in everyday English. It is typically used in specific contexts related to the transmission of information or diseases.

"cannot be connected" vs "are not communicable"

cannot be connected

are not communicable

Related Comparisons