"can halt" vs "can come to a halt"

Question

"can halt" vs "can come to a halt"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Can come to a halt' implies a gradual stopping or slowing down of movement, while 'can halt' is more direct and immediate. The choice between the two depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 06, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate an immediate stopping or halting of something. It implies a sudden and direct action.

Examples:

The emergency brake can halt the train in case of an emergency.
The new regulations can halt the project if we don't comply with them.

Alternatives:

can stop abruptly
can bring to a stop

This phrase is used to indicate that something is gradually stopping or slowing down. It implies a process rather than an immediate action.

Examples:

The car can come to a halt if you press the brake gently.
The negotiations can come to a halt if both parties are not willing to compromise.

Alternatives:

can gradually stop
can slowly come to a stop

Answer 1

can halt

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to describe an immediate stopping or halting of something.

Answer 2

can come to a halt

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to describe a gradual stopping or slowing down of movement.

"can halt" vs "can come to a halt"

can halt

can come to a halt

Related Comparisons