"but in fact the" vs "representative for"

Question

"but in fact the" vs "representative for"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. "But in fact the" is used to introduce a contrasting or clarifying statement, while "representative for" is used to indicate someone or something that stands for or symbolizes a larger group. They are not interchangeable in any context.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is typically used to provide additional information that contradicts or clarifies a previous statement. It is often used in writing or speech to emphasize a point.

Examples:

The weather forecast predicted rain, but in fact, the sun is shining.
I thought she was angry, but in fact, she was just tired.
He claimed to be an expert, but in fact, he had very little experience.
The book was supposed to be a mystery, but in fact, it turned out to be a romance novel.
I expected the movie to be boring, but in fact, it was quite entertaining.

The correct phrase to use is 'representative of', which means someone or something that stands for or symbolizes a larger group.

Alternatives:

representative of
spokesperson for
ambassador for
delegate for
proxy for

Answer 1

but in fact the

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a contrasting or clarifying statement.

Answer 2

representative for

This phrase is incorrect in English. The correct preposition to use with 'representative' is 'of', not 'for'.

"but in fact the" vs "representative for"

but in fact the

representative for

Related Comparisons