TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

between 2014 and 2016 vs during 2014 to 2016

The phrase 'between 2014 and 2016' is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a range of time that includes the two specified years. On the other hand, 'during 2014 to 2016' is not a standard construction in English and is not commonly used.

Last updated: March 31, 2024 • 42 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a range of time that includes the two specified years.

"between 2014 and 2016"

This phrase is used to specify a period that starts at one point in time and ends at another, including both endpoints.

Examples:

  • The project was carried out between 2014 and 2016.
  • The store is open between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
  • The temperature ranged between 20 and 30 degrees Celsius.
  • She will be on vacation between July and August.
  • The event will take place between Monday and Wednesday.
  • With this proposed regulation the Commission seeks gradually to achieve a single target for CO 2 emissions of 175 g CO 2/km for light commercial vehicles between 2014 and 2016.
  • While for modules sales prices fell continuously throughout the period considered, for cells they increased with 5 percentage points between 2014 and the RIP.
  • Should a revision of the Treaties with budgetary implications occur between 2014 and 2020, the MFF shall be revised accordingly.
  • However, it slightly increased between 2014 and the RIP, by 1,4 %.
  • It slightly decreased further between 2014 and the RIP, i.e. by 1,6 %.
  • Indeed, global annual demand had increased by 25 % between 2014 and 2015 (from 40,3 GW to 50,6 GW) [45].
  • The Union industry also started increasing its sales volumes between 2014 and the RIP, once the protective effect of the measures materialized, as set out in recital 171 above.
  • The situation in the Sahel and in Northern Mali deteriorated between 2014 and 2015.
  • If there is an accession or accessions to the Union between 2014 and 2020, the MFF shall be revised to take account of the expenditure requirements resulting therefrom.
  • At the same time the investments of the other two sampled producers increased four times between 2014 and the RIP.
  • The Union industry also increased its investments both for modules and cells by 41 % and 63 % respectively between 2014 and the RIP.
  • On the basis of the proposal, the fund should total EUR 101.2 billion in the period between 2014 and 2020.
  • The budget foreseen to be allocated to PF4EE between 2014 and 2017 is EUR 80 million. The anticipated EIB leverage effect will be six-fold.
  • While production fell by 31 % between 2012 and 2013, it increased by 49 % between 2013 and 2014 and by further 15 % between 2014 and the RIP.
  • It however first increased by 10 % from 2011 to 2012, then it decreased by 14 index points from 2012 to 2014 and finally rose by 3 index points between 2014 and the investigation period.
  • Does the Council consider that some of these States could accede to the Union during the period covered by the next Financial Perspective, i.e. between 2014 and 2020?
  • The exploitation phase shall begin progressively between 2014 and 2015 with the provision of the initial services for the open service, search and rescue service and public regulated service.
  • I think the initial, short-term objective of reaching 175g CO2/km between 2014 and 2017 is indeed quite reasonable, while further reducing emissions to 147 CO2/km can logically be achieved by 2020.
  • Third, regarding imports from third countries, indeed they increased with 2 percentage points between 2014 and the RIP, but decreased by 24 percentage points between 2013 and the RIP.
  • However, there was a major increase in capacity utilisation by 9 percentage points between 2014 and the RIP (that is an increase by 19 %).

Alternatives:

  • from 2014 to 2016
  • starting in 2014 and ending in 2016
  • spanning from 2014 to 2016
  • covering the period 2014 to 2016
  • over the years 2014 to 2016

This phrase is not a standard construction in English and is not commonly used. It is better to use 'between 2014 and 2016' to indicate a range of time.

"during 2014 to 2016"

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo