"Be fed with" vs "Be fed on"

Question

"Be fed with" vs "Be fed on"

Both "be fed on" and "be fed with" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Be fed on" is used when something is consumed by another living thing, like plants being fed on by insects. "Be fed with" is used when someone or something is provided with food or nourishment.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

This phrase is used when someone or something is provided with food or nourishment. For example, babies are fed with milk.

Examples:

The baby was fed with a bottle.
The animals were fed with hay.
The patients were fed with a nutritious meal.
The plants were fed with fertilizer.
The dog was fed with treats.

Alternatives:

be given food
be provided with nourishment
be supplied with sustenance
be nourished with
be sustained by

This phrase is used when something is consumed by another living thing. For example, plants can be fed on by insects.

Examples:

The crops were being fed on by pests.
The carcass was being fed on by vultures.
The leaves were being fed on by caterpillars.

Alternatives:

be consumed by
be eaten by
be devoured by
be preyed upon by
be gnawed on by

Answer 1

Be fed with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

Be fed on

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"Be fed with" vs "Be fed on"

Be fed with

Be fed on

Related Comparisons