"background on the meeting" vs "background for the meeting"

Question

"background on the meeting" vs "background for the meeting"

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. 'Background for the meeting' implies providing information or context that will be useful during the meeting. On the other hand, 'background on the meeting' suggests information about the meeting itself, such as its purpose, participants, or history.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used to refer to information about the meeting itself, such as its purpose, participants, agenda, or any relevant details.

Examples:

I need some background on the meeting before I can contribute effectively.
Can you provide more background on the meeting so we know what to expect?

Alternatives:

information about the meeting
details on the meeting
context of the meeting
overview of the meeting
insight into the meeting

This phrase is used to refer to information or context that will be useful during the meeting, such as previous discussions, relevant data, or key points to consider.

Examples:

I will prepare some background for the meeting to ensure everyone is informed.
Could you provide some background for the meeting so we can understand the context better?

Alternatives:

preparation for the meeting
context for the meeting
information for the meeting
briefing for the meeting
overview for the meeting

Answer 1

background on the meeting

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

background for the meeting

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"background on the meeting" vs "background for the meeting"

background on the meeting

background for the meeting

Related Comparisons